Changeset: 677234770800
Author:dsamersoff
Date: 2011-03-30 19:38 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/677234770800
7017193: Small memory leak in get_stack_bounds os::create_stack_guard_pages
Summary: getline() returns -1 but still allocate memory for str
Hi,
I would like to resubmit this code review. I had the private discussion with
Dan Daugherty and we agreed that it would be good to integrate the current fix
I proposed below. Our reasoning is as follow:
1) It fixes the reported problem
2) The fix is not intended to address 5049313 (which talks
It's ok with me, but I'm not in the Serviceability team anymore.
Make sure Dan is ok with it, or at least knows about it.
-kto
On Mar 31, 2011, at 1:58 AM, Tomas Hurka wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to resubmit this code review. I had the private discussion with
> Dan Daugherty and we agreed that
I'm OK with it and, in fact, I recommend doing the incremental
improvement via 7007254 and leaving 5049313 for another day.
Tomas and I IM'ed about it yesterday.
Dan
On 3/31/2011 9:20 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
It's ok with me, but I'm not in the Serviceability team anymore.
Make sure Dan i
Changeset: 683957148bab
Author:michaelm
Date: 2011-03-31 17:37 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/683957148bab
7032866: Problem with fix for 7030256
Reviewed-by: alanb
! src/windows/native/java/net/net_util_md.c
Changeset: b025bffd6c2c
Author:dholmes
Date: 2011-03-31 06:54 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/b025bffd6c2c
7032775: Include Shark code in the build again
Reviewed-by: ohair
Contributed-by: gben...@redhat.com, ahug...@redhat.com
! make/linux/makefil
On 31/03/2011, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> On 3/30/2011 7:08 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> Ok, what's the best tree to post it against? I don't see a
>>> serviceability tree, so I guess it'll be a HotSpot one...
>>>
>>>
>> The runtime forest (http://hg.openjdk.java.
On 3/31/2011 7:10 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
If this looks ok, it needs a bug ID and then pushing to JPRT by some
friendly Oracle HotSpot developer :-).
Actually, I think we can use the following bug ID:
7010849 5/5 Extraneous javac source/target options when building sa-jdi
if Da
Daniel D. Daugherty said the following on 04/01/11 11:27:
On 3/31/2011 7:10 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
If this looks ok, it needs a bug ID and then pushing to JPRT by some
friendly Oracle HotSpot developer :-).
Actually, I think we can use the following bug ID:
7010849 5/5 Extrane
Changeset: 856cc9e97aea
Author:darcy
Date: 2011-03-31 19:09 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/856cc9e97aea
7005628: Clarify NPE behavior of Throwable.addSuppressed(null)
Reviewed-by: dholmes, mchung, jjb
! src/share/classes/java/lang/ArithmeticException.java
! s
10 matches
Mail list logo