Changeset: 11e52d5ba64e
Author:xuelei
Date: 2012-01-12 03:39 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/11e52d5ba64e
7106773: 512 bits RSA key cannot work with SHA384 and SHA512
Reviewed-by: weijun
! src/share/classes/sun/security/pkcs11/P11Cipher.java
! src/share/classe
Changeset: 133744729455
Author:mcimadamore
Date: 2012-01-12 15:28 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/133744729455
7123100: javac fails with java.lang.StackOverflowError
Summary: Inference of under-constrained type-variables creates erroneous
recursive wildc
Changeset: 020819eb56d2
Author:katleman
Date: 2012-01-05 08:42 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-rt/langtools/rev/020819eb56d2
Added tag jdk8-b20 for changeset ffd294128a48
! .hgtags
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for your comments. Please see my doubts/comments inline :
On 1/11/2012 6:34 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Kurchi,
Sorry for stepping into it at later stage, my few cents.
1. Agent.java
220comments is not relevant any more.
248check of existence of configFile
On 2012-01-13 02:30, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
>> 1. Agent.java
>>
>> 220comments is not relevant any more.
>>
>> 248check of existence of configFile is not necessary.
>
> Thanks, I removed these.
>
>> 255-258 a) Exceptions could be collapsed
>
> This cannot be collapsed since FileNot
On 13/01/2012 7:39 AM, Bill Pittore wrote:
Thanks for the comment. I dug up a slightly dated (refers to SCCS )
coding convention document that recommends not to put bug IDs in the
comments. I'll delete it.
There are numerous places in the hotspot code where comments refer to a
specific CR so I
On 13/01/2012 8:50 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
On 2012-01-13 02:30, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
255-258 a) Exceptions could be collapsed
This cannot be collapsed since FileNotFoundException is a subclass of
IOException.
Does it mean that we can simple remove catch of FileNotFoundException,
replacing
Dmitry,
On 1/11/2012 6:34 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Kurchi,
Sorry for stepping into it at later stage, my few cents.
1. Agent.java
220comments is not relevant any more.
Why is it not relevant any more? Hmm this code is
a bit confusing. The sun.management.snmp.AdaptorBootstra
Changeset: 38bf1e9b6979
Author:weijun
Date: 2012-01-13 09:50 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/38bf1e9b6979
7090565: Move test/closed/javax/security/auth/x500/X500Principal/Parse.java to
open tests
Reviewed-by: mullan
+ test/javax/security/auth/x500/X500Princip
Changeset: ef3b6736c074
Author:valeriep
Date: 2012-01-12 16:04 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/ef3b6736c074
7088989: Improve the performance for T4 by utilizing the newly provided crypto
APIs
Summary: Added the OracleUcrypto provider for utilizing the Solaris
Looks OK. One comment, should we include the CR in comment? I
remember it should not be there.
--Yumin
On 1/12/2012 12:24 PM, Bill Pittore wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for forwarding this to the SA list. I did run the nsk/jvmti
tests from the UTE area on sqenfs-1.us.oracle.com. There were no ne
Hi David,
Thanks for forwarding this to the SA list. I did run the nsk/jvmti
tests from the UTE area on sqenfs-1.us.oracle.com. There were no new
failures with this change.
bill
On 1/12/2012 2:54 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Bill,
I believe this should have gone out to the Serviceability
Thanks for the comment. I dug up a slightly dated (refers to SCCS )
coding convention document that recommends not to put bug IDs in the
comments. I'll delete it.
thanks,
bill
On 1/12/2012 3:34 PM, yumin...@oracle.com wrote:
Looks OK. One comment, should we include the CR in comment? I
rem
13 matches
Mail list logo
