Looks like only the first Interface will be considered if no srcAddress is
provided (succeeded will be false and we will throw to exit the while loop). Is
this intended?
Thanks!
/peter
> On 4 sep 2014, at 17:59, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you so much, Dmitry!
>
> I've cre
Hi Peter,
I fixed it and created new webrev.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8057556/webrev.1/
Could you review it again?
Thanks,
Yasumasa
(2014/09/05 17:20), Peter Allwin wrote:
Looks like only the first Interface will be considered if no srcAddress is
provided (succeeded will b
Hi Daniel,
On 2014-09-04 16:58, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Looks good Stefan!
Thanks a lot for reviewing.
I realized that I need to do some extra hardening so I'll have to send
out an updated version of the test.
thanks,
StefanK
best regards,
-- daniel
On 9/4/14 4:34 PM, Stefan Karlsson wrot
Hi all,
Here's an updated version of the test:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8057174/webrev.01.delta/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8057174/webrev.01/
1) The max == -1 check would unnecessarily fail the test (if it ever
would happen).
2) Some flags/configurations could increase th
Hi,
Could I please have a review of this fix for ProblemList.txt.
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8057686
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ykantser/8057686/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Katja
Looks good!
-JB-
On 09/05/2014 02:38 PM, Yekaterina Kantserova wrote:
Hi,
Could I please have a review of this fix for ProblemList.txt.
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8057686
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ykantser/8057686/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Katja
Jaroslav,
Thank you for the review! Could you please be my sponsor and push the
fix? The patch is attached to this mail.
// Katja
On 09/05/2014 03:01 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Looks good!
-JB-
On 09/05/2014 02:38 PM, Yekaterina Kantserova wrote:
Hi,
Could I please have a review of t
On 04/09/2014 19:44, Staffan Larsen wrote:
Hi Jaroslav,
Thanks for the comments. I think they are valid, but I would prefer to do them
in a separate changeset if that is ok with you?
I still need a JDK 8u Reviewer to look at this.
/Staffan
I think this looks okay and matches the changes in J
Hi,
I have uploaded a new webrev here,
cr.openjdk.java.net/~sfriberg/8055845/webrev.03
It contains several changes
- Split event into two events (PromoteObjectInNewPLAB,
PromoteObjectOutsidePLAB)
- Moved events to "vm/gc/detailed/PromoteObject..."
- Supporting ParNew+CMS and Par