Okay, thanks.
The patch will have to be submitted to JDK 9 first and then back-
ported to earlier releases. Unfortunately it doesn't work on JDK 9.
I don't know why: I spent some time looking at it, but I couldn't
figure out what was wrong.
Is there any way you could have a look? This is using
Hi Andrew,
I could reproduce it in my environment.
* libsaproc debug
```
libsaproc DEBUG: address of _DYNAMIC is 0x563bc6dd8d28
```
* Address of .dynamic in GDB
```
0x563bc6dd7d28 - 0x563bc6dd7f68 is .dynamic
```
It differs 1 page (0x1000).
In this case, according to GDB, `jav
On 08/02/17 14:21, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> It differs 1 page (0x1000).
> In this case, according to GDB, `java` was loaded 0x563bc6dd7000.
> According to readelf of `java`, offset of dynamic section is 0x1d28.
> So I want to investigate why we found 1 memory page difference.
> (Is it caused by AS
