Hi,
If I'm not mistaken then this will make it impossible
for earlier release to interoperate with newer releases
as the LocalRMIClientSocketFactory class will not be
present the client tries to deserialize the stub.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 19/06/2017 11:52, Ujwal Vangapally wrote:
Hi,
On 6/19/17 13:23, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jun 19, 2017, at 1:17 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Mandy,
I've built the docs with your patch and the link is still not resolved.
It points to the docs/api/specs/jpda/jpda.html
It should point to docs/specs/jpda/jpda.html. I verified in
Hi Mandy,
I've built the docs with your patch and the link is still not resolved.
It points to the docs/api/specs/jpda/jpda.html
But it is resolved if the patch is corrected with:
+ *
Is it 9 or 10?
Thanks,
Serguei
On 6/19/17 12:47, Mandy Chung wrote:
Serguei,
Can you review this
+ *
>>> Is it 9 or 10?
>>>
>> I want to fix this simple docs bug in JDK 9.
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> -Serguei
>
>>
>> Mandy
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Serguei
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/19/17 12:47, Mandy Chung wrote:
Serguei,
Can you review this patch fixing the link to JPDA?
Mandy
Thumbs up.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 6/19/17 13:34, Mandy Chung wrote:
+ *
On Jun 19, 2017, at 1:31 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
On 6/19/17 13:23, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jun 19, 2017, at 1:17 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Mandy,
I've built the docs with your patch and the
Serguei,
Can you review this patch fixing the link to JPDA?
Mandy
diff --git a/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/module-info.java
b/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/module-info.java
--- a/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/module-info.java
+++ b/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/module-info.java
@@ -39,12 +39,13 @@
*
Thank you Severin!
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Severin Gehwolf
wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 15:55 +0200, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> > Ping... Anyone?
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Thomas Stüfe > > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
>
Hi Thomas,
this looks good to me. You still need to update the current year in the
copyright header.
Best regards
Christoph
From: serviceability-dev [mailto:serviceability-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net]
On Behalf Of Thomas Stüfe
Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2017 08:31
To:
Thank you Christoph!
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Langer, Christoph <
christoph.lan...@sap.com> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>
>
> this looks good to me. You still need to update the current year in the
> copyright header.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Christoph
>
>
>
> *From:* serviceability-dev
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 15:55 +0200, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> Ping... Anyone?
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Thomas Stüfe > wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > please take a look at this proposed fix for a theoretical race in
> > the jdwp library.
> >
> > Issue:
Hi,
Kindly review the fix for bug below
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173180
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~uvangapally/webrev/2017/8173180/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Ujwal
11 matches
Mail list logo