RFR(XS): 8173917: Safepoint ID is not consistent across event-based tracing events

Hi all, Please review the following change that aligns the safepointId value for the SafepointStateSynchronization event to be consistent with the other related events committed later. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173917 Web

Re: RFR: 8187042: Events to show which objects are associated with biased object revocations

Hi again, Here’s an updated version that adds a separate event for the self-revocation path. It’s a new event class as it is a bit different from the non-self-revocation path, it does not have any relevant safepoint ID for example. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~egahlin/8187042_2/

RFR(XS): 8189274: Allow cutoff attribute for event based tracing

Hi, Could I have a review of this small change that will add the capability to use a cutoff attribute on an event. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~egahlin/8189274/ Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189274 Thanks Erik

RE: RFR(XS): 8189274: Allow cutoff attribute for event based tracing

Looks good Erik, Thanks for adding this. Markus -Original Message- From: Erik Gahlin Sent: den 13 oktober 2017 17:11 To: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: RFR(XS): 8189274: Allow cutoff attribute for event based tracing Hi, Could I have a review of this small change that wi