On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:34:49 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> An issue similar to
> [JDK-8239559](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239559) has been
> discovered. On the
> affected system, `/proc/self/mountinfo` contains a line such as this one:
>
> 35 26 0:26 / /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd rw,n
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:39:09 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> An issue similar to
>> [JDK-8239559](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239559) has been
>> discovered. On the
>> affected system, `/proc/self/mountinfo` contains a line such as this one:
>>
>> 35 26 0:26 / /sys/fs/cgroup/system
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 17:16:50 GMT, Monica Beckwith wrote:
>> Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).
>
>> The JEP is not yet targeted so we have to wait for that formality. But
>> once that happens I can sponsor for you.
>
> Thanks.
>>
>> Also note that the PR references the wrong JEP so can you
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:26:10 GMT, Monica Beckwith wrote:
> This is a continuation of
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/aarch64-port-dev/2020-August/009566.html
>
> Changes since then:
> * We've improved the write barrier as suggested by Andrew [1]
> * The define-guards around R18 have
Hi Vladimir,
On 3/10/2020 1:29 am, Vladimir Kempik wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 07:34:45 GMT, Vladimir Kempik wrote:
If you still see no issues here we can delay and make this changeset part of
JEP-391.
But since this changeset isn't much macos-aarch64 specific, I thought it would
be good to in
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 03:20:43 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> @mo-beck The initial comment still has this incorrect link:
>
> [2] https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/8251280
>
> Please edit the comment and fix the link.
That was a link to the macOS + Arm64 port. But I have removed it as it wasn't
needed i
