> The fix of:
>8252657 JVMTI agent is not unloaded when Agent_OnAttach is failed
> did not update the JVM TI spec history at the end of document.
> This PR adds missed item to the JVM TI spec history.
Serguei Spitsyn has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a reb
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 19:11:45 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> The fix of:
>8252657 JVMTI agent is not unloaded when Agent_OnAttach is failed
> did not update the JVM TI spec history at the end of document.
> This PR adds missed item to the JVM TI spec history.
This pull request has now been int
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 08:56:32 GMT, Ludovic Henry wrote:
>> When the signal sent for AsyncGetCallTrace or JFR would land on a runtime
>> stub (like arraycopy), a vtable stub, or the prolog of a compiled method,
>> it wouldn't be able to detect the sender (caller) frame for multiple
>> reasons.
> …ocess cpu usage in containers
xpbob has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
use same path for cpuload
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4702/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4702
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:19:42 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Thanks for the update. `getProcessCpuLoad()` and `getCpuLoad()` looks way too
> similar to me. Is there a way to make them more generic and do the process
> vs. system paths as needed? I think there is.
use getCpuLoadWithTarget for proc
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 03:12:24 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
>> After JDK-8265518(#3615), it's possible to replace all variants of
>> checkIndex by
>> Objects.checkIndex/Objects.checkFromToIndex/Objects.checkFromIndexSize in
>> the whole JDK codebase.
>
> Yi Yang has refreshed the contents of this pull req
