On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 16:55:31 GMT, Richard Reingruber wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is the continuation of the review of the implementation for:
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227745
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233915
>>
>> It allows for JIT optimizations based on
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 16:55:31 GMT, Richard Reingruber wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is the continuation of the review of the implementation for:
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227745
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233915
>>
>> It allows for JIT optimizations based on
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:34:49 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> An issue similar to
> [JDK-8239559](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239559) has been
> discovered. On the
> affected system, `/proc/self/mountinfo` contains a line such as this one:
>
> 35 26 0:26 / /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd
> An issue similar to
> [JDK-8239559](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239559) has been
> discovered. On the
> affected system, `/proc/self/mountinfo` contains a line such as this one:
>
> 35 26 0:26 / /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime - cgroup
> systemd
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:16:51 GMT, Lin Zang wrote:
>> Hi Lin,
>>
>> Sorry for not getting to this sooner. One of the reasons is that I haven't
>> had time to explore a better solution, but
>> the above notification triggered me to at least share my thoughts.
>> I would like us to avoid having
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 11:10:14 GMT, Stefan Johansson wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> May I ask your help to review this PR? Thanks!
>> -Lin
>
> Hi Lin,
>
> Sorry for not getting to this sooner. One of the reasons is that I haven't
> had time to explore a better solution, but
> the above notification
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:13:44 GMT, Ziviani
wrote:
> TestInstanceKlassSize was failing because, for PowerPC, the following code
> (instanceKlass.cpp) always compiles to
> `return false;` bool InstanceKlass::has_stored_fingerprint() const {
> #if INCLUDE_AOT
> return should_store_fingerprint()
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:25:37 GMT, Lin Zang wrote:
>> - Parallel heap iteration support for PSS
>> - JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252103
>
> Dear All,
> May I ask your help to review this PR? Thanks!
> -Lin
Hi Lin,
Sorry for not getting to this sooner. One of the reasons is
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:51:29 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> I don't think so. It starts out as `false` and is being set to true on lines
>> 180 and 174. So we could change it to
>> `return false` here iff lines 174 and 180 would `return true`.
>
> Yes, that's what I meant: instead of dragging
> An issue similar to
> [JDK-8239559](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239559) has been
> discovered. On the
> affected system, `/proc/self/mountinfo` contains a line such as this one:
>
> 35 26 0:26 / /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime - cgroup
> systemd
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:46:55 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/internal/platform/CgroupSubsystemFactory.java
>> line 183:
>>
>>> 181: }
>>> 182: }
>>> 183: return relevantControllerFound;
>>
>> If I am reading the code right, then
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:23:22 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Return false in case of no pattern match
>
>
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 13:38:59 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> An issue similar to
>> [JDK-8239559](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239559) has been
>> discovered. On the
>> affected system, `/proc/self/mountinfo` contains a line such as this one:
>>
>> 35 26 0:26 /
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:43:41 GMT, Erik Österlund wrote:
> This PR the implementation of "JEP 376: ZGC: Concurrent Thread-Stack
> Processing" (cf.
> https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/376).
> Basically, this patch modifies the epilog safepoint when returning from a
> frame (supporting interpreter
> This PR the implementation of "JEP 376: ZGC: Concurrent Thread-Stack
> Processing" (cf.
> https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/376).
> Basically, this patch modifies the epilog safepoint when returning from a
> frame (supporting interpreter frames, c1, c2,
> and native wrapper frames), to compare the
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 10:52:53 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov wrote:
>> continuing the review thread from here
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
>>
>>> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
>>> setup a bit for those that
16 matches
Mail list logo
