On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:40:53 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Please review this container test improvement. The test in question only
> makes sense iff the total swap space size as reported by the container aware
> OperatingSystemMXBean is `0`. If that's not the case, then something else
>
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 02:03:26 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
>> This PR implements JEP 422: Linux/RISC-V Port [1].
>> The PR starts as a squashed merge of the
>> https://openjdk.java.net/projects/riscv-port branch.
>>
>> This has been tested with jtreg tier{1,2,3,4} and jcstress on HiFive
>> Unmatched
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 01:57:25 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
>> src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/disassembler_riscv.hpp line 18:
>>
>>> 16: *
>>> 17: * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>>> version
>>> 18: * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software
>>>
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:34:18 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Fei Yang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address review comments
>
> src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/disassembler_riscv.hpp line 18:
>
>> 16: *
>> 17: * You should
> This PR implements JEP 422: Linux/RISC-V Port [1].
> The PR starts as a squashed merge of the
> https://openjdk.java.net/projects/riscv-port branch.
>
> This has been tested with jtreg tier{1,2,3,4} and jcstress on HiFive
> Unmatched board. Dacapo, SPECjbb2015 and SPECjvm2008 benchmark tests
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 14:01:28 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> The test/jdk files look ok. (I didn't look at the rest)
Thank you for looking at that part.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6294
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 21:19:20 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> There are no uses of jdk/internal/agent/spi/AgentProvider, since the SNMP
> agent was removed ( 8071367 ): this class should be removed. It is not a
> public interface.
>
> Remove
>
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 21:19:20 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> There are no uses of jdk/internal/agent/spi/AgentProvider, since the SNMP
> agent was removed ( 8071367 ): this class should be removed. It is not a
> public interface.
>
> Remove
>
There are no uses of jdk/internal/agent/spi/AgentProvider, since the SNMP agent
was removed ( 8071367 ): this class should be removed. It is not a public
interface.
Remove
src/jdk.management.agent/share/classes/jdk/internal/agent/spi/AgentProvider.java
Remove import from
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:50:13 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
>> This PR implements JEP 422: Linux/RISC-V Port [1].
>> The PR starts as a squashed merge of the
>> https://openjdk.java.net/projects/riscv-port branch.
>>
>> This has been tested with jtreg tier{1,2,3,4} and jcstress on HiFive
>> Unmatched
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:50:13 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
>> This PR implements JEP 422: Linux/RISC-V Port [1].
>> The PR starts as a squashed merge of the
>> https://openjdk.java.net/projects/riscv-port branch.
>>
>> This has been tested with jtreg tier{1,2,3,4} and jcstress on HiFive
>> Unmatched
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:50:13 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
>> This PR implements JEP 422: Linux/RISC-V Port [1].
>> The PR starts as a squashed merge of the
>> https://openjdk.java.net/projects/riscv-port branch.
>>
>> This has been tested with jtreg tier{1,2,3,4} and jcstress on HiFive
>> Unmatched
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:08:01 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
>> make/autoconf/libraries.m4 line 152:
>>
>>> 150: fi
>>> 151:
>>> 152: # Programs which use C11 or C++11 atomics, like #include ,
>>
>> Use of C++ atomics is not allowed in hotspot code base. See the style guide:
>>
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:50:13 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
>> This PR implements JEP 422: Linux/RISC-V Port [1].
>> The PR starts as a squashed merge of the
>> https://openjdk.java.net/projects/riscv-port branch.
>>
>> This has been tested with jtreg tier{1,2,3,4} and jcstress on HiFive
>> Unmatched
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 04:13:17 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Fei Yang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits
>>
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 05:12:46 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've looked at everything that is not a RISC-V specific file, except for the
> C1 changes as the compiler folk will need to approve those.
>
> Some copyrights will need updating to 2022 on the Oracle copyright line
> please.
Hi
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:31:16 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
>> This PR implements JEP 422: Linux/RISC-V Port [1].
>> The PR starts as a squashed merge of the
>> https://openjdk.java.net/projects/riscv-port branch.
>>
>> This has been tested with jtreg tier{1,2,3,4} and jcstress on HiFive
>> Unmatched
> This PR implements JEP 422: Linux/RISC-V Port [1].
> The PR starts as a squashed merge of the
> https://openjdk.java.net/projects/riscv-port branch.
>
> This has been tested with jtreg tier{1,2,3,4} and jcstress on HiFive
> Unmatched board. Dacapo, SPECjbb2015 and SPECjvm2008 benchmark tests
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 20:22:16 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> Removing permission checks which, in the presence of a Security Manager,
> would check for a RuntimePermission "className.subclass". This was to
> prevent subclassing these classes, but is no longer necessary with strong
> encapsulation
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 20:19:03 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
>> Removing permission checks which, in the presence of a Security Manager,
>> would check for a RuntimePermission "className.subclass". This was to
>> prevent subclassing these classes, but is no longer necessary with strong
>>
20 matches
Mail list logo
