know any comments or suggestions.
Thank you
--
With best regards,
Taras Ledkov
Mail-To: taras.led...@oracle.com
skype: taras_ledkov
Phone: 7(812)3346-157
if you see anything wrong with this fix.
Taras
--
With best regards,
Taras Ledkov
Mail-To: taras.led...@oracle.com
skype: taras_ledkov
Phone: 7(812)3346-157
/~rriggs/webrev-localmanagement-8028141/
Thanks, Roger
--
With best regards,
Taras Ledkov
Mail-To: taras.led...@oracle.com
skype: taras_ledkov
Phone: 7(812)3346-157
138/webrev.00/test/lib/testlibrary/jdk/testlibrary/Utils.java.sdiff.html
- These tests will need additional changes when test library process
tools will support command line options inheritance
(http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2013-November/013235.html)
--
With best r
try
On 2013-11-20 15:54, taras ledkov wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am working on bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7195249.
There are two webrevs:
Webrev for jdk part:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anazarov/7195249/jdk/webrev.00/
Webrev for hs part:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anazar
a
On 12/02/2013 01:39 PM, taras ledkov wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Whatever logic is to be chosen to select a free port, it is the
library responsibility to implements it, would not you agree?
Hence what I am suggesting is to integrate the tests as is.
Should we decide to replace logic of the port sel
via the AbstractFilePermissionTest (see the doTest method,
AbstractFilePermissionTest : 162).
Thanks,
/Staffan
On 26 dec 2013, at 14:09, taras ledkov wrote:
Hi,
Please take a look at the review with fixed issues about trying to launch test
that needs free port several times.
Webrev for jdk p
Hi Staffan,
I fixed the tests according with your comments.
Are you OK?
On 15.01.2014 19:15, taras ledkov wrote:
Hi,
Please take a look at the new review.
Webrev for jdk part:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anazarov/7195249/jdk/webrev.02/
Webrev for hs part:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net
Hi Jaroslav,
Could you please review the last changes?
Are you OK?
On 20.01.2014 19:21, Staffan Larsen wrote:
Sorry for not replying earlier. Yes, I’m ok with these changes.
Thanks,
/Staffan
On 20 jan 2014, at 16:07, taras ledkov wrote:
Hi Staffan,
I fixed the tests according with your
/
Webrev for hs part:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anazarov/7195249/hs/webrev.03/
On 21.01.2014 13:45, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Hi Taras,
On 21.1.2014 10:30, taras ledkov wrote:
Hi Jaroslav,
Could you please review the last changes?
Are you OK?
Yes, the change looks ok. But I think we will
emote/bootstrap/SSLConfigFilePermissionTest.java".
It does not use any of those classes as its base class
"AbstractFilePermissionTest" does all the heavy lifting.
Cheers,
-JB-
On 5.2.2014 13:42, taras ledkov wrote:
Hi,
So please take a look at the review against JDK9.
The reviewe
/
Webrev for hs part:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anazarov/7195249/hs/webrev.03/
On 25.02.2014 17:52, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Thumbs up. (not a "reviewer", though)
-JB-
On 19.2.2014 12:05, taras ledkov wrote:
Hi,
Imports are fixed:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anazarov/7195249/jdk/webr
Staffan, Excuse me.
I didn't know about that.
I looked at the http://openjdk.java.net/census#serviceability.
Now I'm in need of the second review.
On 26.02.2014 18:36, Staffan Larsen wrote:
On 26 feb 2014, at 15:24, taras ledkov wrote:
Hi,
Alan, Mandy could you please revi
13 matches
Mail list logo
