On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:23:39 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> [JDK-8248675](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8248675) no longer seems to
> be reproducing, even before
> [JDK-8313800](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313800) was just pushed.
> I'm not sure what may have fixed it, but even if
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 03:16:03 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
> Fine with fix, assuming you verified that test doesn't fail with Xcomp on
> linux-aarch64.
Yes, I tested with 100s of runs on linux-aarch64 with -Xcomp. Can I push this
as a trivial change?
-
PR Comment:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:23:39 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> [JDK-8248675](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8248675) no longer seems to
> be reproducing, even before
> [JDK-8313800](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313800) was just pushed.
> I'm not sure what may have fixed it, but even if
[JDK-8248675](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8248675) no longer seems to
be reproducing, even before
[JDK-8313800](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313800) was just pushed. I'm
not sure what may have fixed it, but even if the bug was potentially still
there, it has likely been fixed
