On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 22:48:18 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> @eme64 Is it feasible to split this up to solve each of the problems you
>> identify in stages? There is also overlap here with JDK-8319709 IIUC. Thanks.
>
>> @dholmes-ora These are the "parts":
>>
>> 1. initialize up to capacity vs l
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 07:56:04 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
> Before this patch, we always initialized the GrowableArray up to its
> `capacity`, and not just up to `length`. This is problematic for a few
> reasons:
>
> - It is not expected. `std::vector` also only initializes the elements up to
> i
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 22:48:18 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> @eme64 Is it feasible to split this up to solve each of the problems you
>> identify in stages? There is also overlap here with JDK-8319709 IIUC. Thanks.
>
>> @dholmes-ora These are the "parts":
>>
>> 1. initialize up to capacity vs l
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 07:56:04 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
> Before this patch, we always initialized the GrowableArray up to its
> `capacity`, and not just up to `length`. This is problematic for a few
> reasons:
>
> - It is not expected. `std::vector` also only initializes the elements up to
> i
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 07:56:04 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
> Before this patch, we always initialized the GrowableArray up to its
> `capacity`, and not just up to `length`. This is problematic for a few
> reasons:
>
> - It is not expected. `std::vector` also only initializes the elements up to
> i
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 07:49:04 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Before this patch, we always initialized the GrowableArray up to its
>> `capacity`, and not just up to `length`. This is problematic for a few
>> reasons:
>>
>> - It is not expected. `std::vector` also only initializes the elements up to
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 07:49:04 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Before this patch, we always initialized the GrowableArray up to its
>> `capacity`, and not just up to `length`. This is problematic for a few
>> reasons:
>>
>> - It is not expected. `std::vector` also only initializes the elements up to
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 07:56:04 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
> Before this patch, we always initialized the GrowableArray up to its
> `capacity`, and not just up to `length`. This is problematic for a few
> reasons:
>
> - It is not expected. `std::vector` also only initializes the elements up to
> i
Before this patch, we always initialized the GrowableArray up to its
`capacity`, and not just up to `length`. This is problematic for a few reasons:
- It is not expected. `std::vector` also only initializes the elements up to
its size, and not to capacity.
- It requires a default-constructor for
