On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 18:16:52 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> In the fix for the following bug:
>>
>> [JDK-8319935](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319935) Ensure only one
>> JvmtiThreadState is created for one JavaThread associated with attached
>> native thread
>>
>> JvmtiThreadState:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 20:52:46 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> In the interest of reducing the noise in the Mach5 CI, I'm going ahead with
> integrating this fix without waiting for a reply to my comment above. If
> there are remaining issues, then we'll deal with them in a follow-up bug/RFE.
T
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 20:52:46 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>> @jianglizhou - Thanks for doing the testing. Can you also do a review? We
>>> need two reviewers for this change.
>>
>> Complete test run finished. Checking the results, looks like there's no
>> issue related to JVMTIThreadState c
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 19:01:05 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
>> @dcubed-ojdk Thanks for the notification. I just ran one of our affected
>> test 100 times with JDK-8312174 change rolled back and with both following
>> applied:
>>
>> - https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16642
>> - https://github.com/open
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 18:13:50 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Initially I thought this was not the right fix as we should not be exposing
>> an attaching thread that may still have a partially constructed `threadObj`.
>> But this issue shows that we must expose such a thread because the
>> co
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 18:16:52 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> In the fix for the following bug:
>>
>> [JDK-8319935](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319935) Ensure only one
>> JvmtiThreadState is created for one JavaThread associated with attached
>> native thread
>>
>> JvmtiThreadState:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 18:16:52 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> In the fix for the following bug:
>>
>> [JDK-8319935](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319935) Ensure only one
>> JvmtiThreadState is created for one JavaThread associated with attached
>> native thread
>>
>> JvmtiThreadState:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 05:16:59 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
>> In the fix for the following bug:
>>
>> [JDK-8319935](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319935) Ensure only one
>> JvmtiThreadState is created for one JavaThread associated with attached
>> native thread
>>
>> JvmtiThreadState::state_
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 06:31:43 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Daniel D. Daugherty has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> dholmes CR - adjust a comment.
>
> Initially I thought this was not the right fix as we should not be exposing
>
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 05:16:59 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
>> In the fix for the following bug:
>>
>> [JDK-8319935](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319935) Ensure only one
>> JvmtiThreadState is created for one JavaThread associated with attached
>> native thread
>>
>> JvmtiThreadState::state_
> In the fix for the following bug:
>
> [JDK-8319935](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319935) Ensure only one
> JvmtiThreadState is created for one JavaThread associated with attached
> native thread
>
> JvmtiThreadState::state_for_while_locked() was changed to
> return nullptr for attachi
On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 17:15:57 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> In the fix for the following bug:
>
> [JDK-8319935](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319935) Ensure only one
> JvmtiThreadState is created for one JavaThread associated with attached
> native thread
>
> JvmtiThreadState::state_
On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 17:15:57 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> In the fix for the following bug:
>
> [JDK-8319935](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319935) Ensure only one
> JvmtiThreadState is created for one JavaThread associated with attached
> native thread
>
> JvmtiThreadState::state_
In the fix for the following bug:
[JDK-8319935](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319935) Ensure only one
JvmtiThreadState is created for one JavaThread associated with attached native
thread
JvmtiThreadState::state_for_while_locked() was changed to
return nullptr for attaching JNI threads r
14 matches
Mail list logo