Re: RFR: 8324845: management.properties text "interface name" is misleading [v2]

2024-02-01 Thread Kevin Walls
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 21:29:14 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: >> We have the text "host-or-interface-name" describing the >> com.sun.management.jmxremote.host property in management.properties, but >> interface names (like "eth0" or "lo", or "ens3"...) are not what it accepts. >> It should just say

Re: RFR: 8324845: management.properties text "interface name" is misleading [v2]

2024-01-31 Thread Alan Bateman
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 21:29:14 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: >> We have the text "host-or-interface-name" describing the >> com.sun.management.jmxremote.host property in management.properties, but >> interface names (like "eth0" or "lo", or "ens3"...) are not what it accepts. >> It should just say

Re: RFR: 8324845: management.properties text "interface name" is misleading [v2]

2024-01-31 Thread Mandy Chung
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 21:29:14 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: >> We have the text "host-or-interface-name" describing the >> com.sun.management.jmxremote.host property in management.properties, but >> interface names (like "eth0" or "lo", or "ens3"...) are not what it accepts. >> It should just say

Re: RFR: 8324845: management.properties text "interface name" is misleading [v2]

2024-01-31 Thread Kevin Walls
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:24:45 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Kevin Walls has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> text update > > src/jdk.management.agent/share/conf/management.properties line 258: > >> 256: # >> 257: #

Re: RFR: 8324845: management.properties text "interface name" is misleading [v2]

2024-01-31 Thread Kevin Walls
> We have the text "host-or-interface-name" describing the > com.sun.management.jmxremote.host property in management.properties, but > interface names (like "eth0" or "lo", or "ens3"...) are not what it accepts. > It should just say it needs to be a host name or address. > > This change only