Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 15:55 +0200, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> Ping... Anyone?
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Thomas Stüfe > wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > please take a look at this proposed fix for a theoretical race in
> > the jdwp library.
> >
> > Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net
Thank you Severin!
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Severin Gehwolf
wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 15:55 +0200, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> > Ping... Anyone?
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Thomas Stüfe > > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > please take a look at this proposed f
Hi Thomas,
this looks good to me. You still need to update the current year in the
copyright header.
Best regards
Christoph
From: serviceability-dev [mailto:serviceability-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net]
On Behalf Of Thomas Stüfe
Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2017 08:31
To: serviceability-dev@openj
Thank you Christoph!
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Langer, Christoph <
christoph.lan...@sap.com> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>
>
> this looks good to me. You still need to update the current year in the
> copyright header.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Christoph
>
>
>
> *From:* serviceability-dev [mailt
Hi,
Kindly review the fix for bug below
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173180
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~uvangapally/webrev/2017/8173180/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Ujwal
Hi,
If I'm not mistaken then this will make it impossible
for earlier release to interoperate with newer releases
as the LocalRMIClientSocketFactory class will not be
present the client tries to deserialize the stub.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 19/06/2017 11:52, Ujwal Vangapally wrote:
Hi,
Ki
Serguei,
Can you review this patch fixing the link to JPDA?
Mandy
diff --git a/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/module-info.java
b/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/module-info.java
--- a/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/module-info.java
+++ b/src/jdk.jdi/share/classes/module-info.java
@@ -39,12 +39,13 @@
* crea
Hi Mandy,
I've built the docs with your patch and the link is still not resolved.
It points to the docs/api/specs/jpda/jpda.html
But it is resolved if the patch is corrected with:
+ *
Is it 9 or 10?
Thanks,
Serguei
On 6/19/17 12:47, Mandy Chung wrote:
Serguei,
Can you review this patch
> On Jun 19, 2017, at 1:17 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> Hi Mandy,
>
> I've built the docs with your patch and the link is still not resolved.
> It points to the docs/api/specs/jpda/jpda.html
>
It should point to docs/specs/jpda/jpda.html. I verified in my build.
Are you sure your
On 6/19/17 13:23, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jun 19, 2017, at 1:17 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Mandy,
I've built the docs with your patch and the link is still not resolved.
It points to the docs/api/specs/jpda/jpda.html
It should point to docs/specs/jpda/jpda.html. I verified in m
+ *
>>> Is it 9 or 10?
>>>
>> I want to fix this simple docs bug in JDK 9.
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> -Serguei
>
>>
>> Mandy
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Serguei
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/19/17 12:47, Mandy Chung wrote:
Serguei,
Can you review this patch fixing the link to JPDA?
Mandy
>>>
Thumbs up.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 6/19/17 13:34, Mandy Chung wrote:
+ *
On Jun 19, 2017, at 1:31 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
On 6/19/17 13:23, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jun 19, 2017, at 1:17 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Mandy,
I've built the docs with your patch and the li
Hi,
Please review the below RFE,
JDK-8182485 : JMX connections should have configurable ObjectInputFilter
having webrev at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hb/8182485/webrev.00/
The enhancement adds ObjectInputFilter to JMX connections to configure
filters during deserialization.
-Harsha
13 matches
Mail list logo
