Re: RFR : 8167294 - MXBean javadoc should be updated to take modules into account

2016-10-14 Thread Mandy Chung
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 1:54 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > On 14/10/2016 09:08, Amit Sapre wrote: >> Alan, >> >> >> >> I updated thedescription and changes are available in this webrev >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/sponsorships/8167294/webrev.01/ >> >> >

Re: RFR : 8167294 - MXBean javadoc should be updated to take modules into account

2016-10-14 Thread Alan Bateman
On 14/10/2016 09:08, Amit Sapre wrote: Alan, I updated the description and changes are available in this webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/sponsorships/8167294/webrev.01/ I realize I suggested the wording for

RE: RFR : 8167294 - MXBean javadoc should be updated to take modules into account

2016-10-14 Thread Amit Sapre
Alan, I updated the description and changes are available in this webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/sponsorships/8167294/webrev.01/ Amit From: Alan Bateman Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 1:03 PM To: Amit Sapre; serviceability-dev Subject: Re: RFR : 8167294 - MXBean

Re: RFR : 8167294 - MXBean javadoc should be updated to take modules into account

2016-10-13 Thread Alan Bateman
On 13/10/2016 07:42, Amit Sapre wrote: Hello, Please review this small javadoc update. Bug ID : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167294 Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/sponsorships/8167294/webrev.00/