Sounds like a clean solution to me
+1
P
On 7/23/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed.
I think we must provide a way to easily upgrade a component (for example)
using a ant / maven task
without having to undeploy all the SAs, shutting down the component,
uninstall, reinstall,
Quoting the JBI spec:
SEs are the business logic drivers of the JBI system.
BCs are used to send and receive messages via particular protocols and
transports.
Let's talk about the jsr181 component. I think the definition for BCs
clearly indicates
that the jsr181 component is not a BC, so I think
Its a good point - though I think a lot of people at attaching themselves to
the lw-container as the de-facto mechanism for developing JBI components,
we should probably start trying to break down what they want to achieve and
offer up some better SE's in that case. Maybe an EJB3 SE would allow
On 7/24/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah I know the spec speaks about SE and the business logic - though I
tend
to this that was meant in the context of BPEL and Business Process - I
suppose the question becomes if i have an application that wants to expose
functionality should
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-492?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet closed SM-492.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Fail Run ServiceMix 3-0-M1.
---
Key: SM-492
URL:
