[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chad Gallemoare updated SM-1027:
Attachment: Sm-1027.zip
I've attached the component.xml file and the ComponentTest that I modified
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruce Snyder resolved SM-1033.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.2
> WSDL-First example fails due to missing defaultMep attri
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39965
]
Bruce Snyder commented on SM-1033:
--
Committed fix:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=566880
> WSDL-Fir
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruce Snyder reassigned SM-1033:
Assignee: Bruce Snyder
> WSDL-First example fails due to missing defaultMep attribute in
> wsdl-f
WSDL-First example fails due to missing defaultMep attribute in
wsdl-first-http-su's xbean.xml
---
Key: SM-1033
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1033
Hello,
As there is a lot of activity on all the servicemix mailing lists, it
seems that servicemix is used from a lot of companies and people. We
would be very interested in what you are doing with servicemix as
well as what your company is doing.
If your are interested to be listed as users on t
This solution is intended for the provider site not for the consumer
site. So what I mean is to limit the outgoing connections from
servicemix (for example to an external web service) over the provider
endpoint with the thread limit. It doesn't depend on the consumer
site.
Do you know what I mea
Terry Cox wrote:
>> So if you let the thread pool define the mnumber of connections you
>> wouldn't get a hang and would not lose any messages. Am I right?
>
>
> Not necessarily. What you are doing in that situation is directly
> coupling the number of internal threads with the number of external
So if you let the thread pool define the mnumber of connections you
wouldn't get a hang and would not lose any messages. Am I right?
Not necessarily. What you are doing in that situation is directly
coupling the number of internal threads with the number of external
connections, leaving the ma
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39961
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1002:
-
I think that if you allow more connections that the number of threads
avail
Terry Cox wrote:
>> So what if we put both limits to a very high number in the default
>> configuration ? Is there any drawbacks?
>
>
> The risk there is that you are just increasing the size of the bang when
> it goes wrong. The system must degrade gracefully under heavy load in a
> production e
So what if we put both limits to a very high number in the default
configuration ? Is there any drawbacks?
The risk there is that you are just increasing the size of the bang when
it goes wrong. The system must degrade gracefully under heavy load in a
production environment. If it has operatin
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39959
]
Thomas Termin commented on SM-1002:
---
So if I understand you correctly then you will limit the number of connections
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39958
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1002:
-
This is a good idea. The only problem is to make sure that if a connection
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39957
]
Thomas Termin commented on SM-1002:
---
Bruce,
The problem seems to be in the ProviderProcessor:
You can test this wit
15 matches
Mail list logo
