Hi
some days ago I asked for an implementation of the Content-Enricher
pattern on the ServiceMix user list.
(http://www.enterpriseintegrationpatterns.com/DataEnricher.html). But I
never received any reply to that mail. So I started to implement that
pattern and attached the first version as
??? Is it a bug or a bad workaround for my
problem??
The question to me is: Is it correct to 'loose' the information about the
operation?? Do I have to add this information within my routing rule reading the
property (how?)?
Thanks!
Kristian
--
Kristian Köhler
software architect
dmc digital media
I also meant that if there is not, it should be added :-)
Ok... ;-)
sure we could
find a way to use it from EJB to access JBI for example... Have you
already thought about such things ?
On 10/20/07, Kristian Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
yesterday I finally realeased the first version of my
ServiveMix/Geronimo distribution. You can find
Hi Guillaume
looks ok for me. Thanks!
Kristian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Guillaume Nodet (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. Oktober 2007 22:42
An: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Betreff: [jira] Resolved: (SM-1085) Additional geronimo
deployment plan