[sfc-dev] Problem in odl sfc when deleting a path has a shared SF with other path

2017-04-20 Thread Ahmed Medhat
Hi Brady, hi Manuel, I have discovered a bug in ODL sfc boron ( in opnfv colorado). When I have 2 RSPs for 2 chains have a shared SF instance ( i.e. fw-1). Then I delete one of the RSPs, there is a flow rule responsible for forwarding the packets to that SF instance (fw-1) is also deleted. So th

Re: [sfc-dev] Problem in odl sfc when deleting a path has a shared SF with other path

2017-04-20 Thread Manuel Buil
Hello Ahmed, Yep, that is a known bug which we need to fix. There is one person looking into it + creating a testcase in OPNFV but I haven't heard from him for some time. Could you please add it to bugzilla? https://bugs.opendaylight.org/ No fix for it yet :(. Thanks, Manuel  On Thu, 2017-04-

Re: [sfc-dev] Problem in odl sfc when deleting a path has a shared SF with other path

2017-04-20 Thread Ahmed Medhat
Thanks Manuel, I added it to bugzilla. Best regards, Ahmed On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Manuel Buil wrote: > Hello Ahmed, > > Yep, that is a known bug which we need to fix. There is one person > looking into it + creating a testcase in OPNFV but I haven't heard from > him for some time. >

[sfc-dev] Two potential bugs in Carbon SFC?

2017-04-20 Thread Manuel Buil
Hey guys, I am using a build from Monday and I found two things which might be wrong. Before adding them to bugzilla, I wanted to check with you. ### Number 1 ### @Faseela, Kency here you might help :) When creating the RSP this flow is created in table=17 of the SFF: table=17, n_packets=6, n_b

Re: [sfc-dev] Two potential bugs in Carbon SFC?

2017-04-20 Thread Brady Allen Johnson
Manuel, About the first problem, I'll have to check, but I think we need to consider the metadata in the match, and the metadata in the action. Notice the match "metadata=0x100/0xff00" has the value 1 as expected, since this particular flow is for SFC and goes to table 83 w

[sfc-dev] Regarding vxlan_tool.py in SFC vNF

2017-04-20 Thread Srikanth Lingala
Hi, I am working on ODL SFC. I am able to execute the basic SFC usecase. But, I just want to understand, what vxlan_tool.py does in SFC vNF. Is it forward packets to next vNF based on NSH header? Can anyone please let me know, what are the specific tasks, which are handled by vxlan_tool.py? Reg

Re: [sfc-dev] [opnfv-tech-discuss] Regarding vxlan_tool.py in SFC vNF

2017-04-20 Thread Tim Rozet
Hi Srikanth, It just decrements the NSH service index and sends it back out, like a dummy VNF. I don't think it does anything else. Would be nice to have a real NSH enabled VNF to demo with in the future. Tim Rozet Red Hat SDN Team - Original Message - From: "Srikanth Lingala" To: sf

[sfc-dev] OVS installation issue with NSH patch

2017-04-20 Thread Kiruthiga R
Hi Team, I am trying to install OVS 2.5 with the NSH patch available in https://github.com/yyang13/ovs_nsh_patches I am facing error while doing "make". Attached the screenshot of error message. Please help with the issue. Regards, Kiruthiga ___ sfc-de

Re: [sfc-dev] OVS installation issue with NSH patch

2017-04-20 Thread Yang, Yi Y
ovs 2.5 only can be built on Linux kernel 3.10 to 4.3. From: sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Kiruthiga R Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 1:20 PM To: sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: [sfc-dev] OVS installation issue with NSH p