An,

Thanks for pointing that out.

I didn't know that cardinal, nic, and faas officially depended on sfc. Nic
and faas mentioned possibly using sfc in the past, but we were never
notified officially.

The only official dependencies we know about are netvirt and gbp, and they
both gave us the go ahead.

Since the patch has already been merged, I guess we should go ahead and
create a weather report.

Regards,

Brady

On Oct 17, 2016 20:04, "An Ho" <an...@huawei.com> wrote:

> Should we open a weather item for tracking purposes since from the
> dependencies log [1], a few other projects have dependencies on SFC:
> cardinal, faas, groupbasedpolicy, netvirt, nic?
>
> I have CC'ed the other projects to keep them informed of the changes to
> SFC.
>
> Best Regards,
> An Ho
>
> [1] https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/autorelease-
> project-report-carbon/10/archives/dependencies.log.gz
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:
> release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Brady Allen Johnson
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:50 AM
> To: netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org; groupbasedpolicy-dev@lists.
> opendaylight.org; rele...@lists.opendaylight.org;
> sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
> Subject: Re: [release] SFC project changing module artifact versions in
> maven in Colorado
>
> Including sfc-dev email list.
>
> Brady
>
>
> On 17/10/16 10:49, Brady Allen Johnson wrote:
> >
> > Hello Netvirt and GBP projects,
> >
> > I wanted to inform the projects that officially depend on SFC (Netvirt
> > and GBP) that we will be changing the module artifact versions soon.
> >
> > This is as a result of these email threads [0] and [1]. We discussed
> > the solution in this thread [2].
> >
> > I really doubt this will cause problems for your projects. Basically
> > we'll bump SFC from 0.4.0 to 0.5.0.
> >
> > A patch has been created here [3]. We wont merge this until we get the
> > go ahead from both projects (Netvirt and GBP).
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Brady
> >
> > [0]
> > https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/sfc-dev/2016-
> October/003475.html
> > [1]
> > https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/sfc-dev/2016-
> October/003481.html
> > [2]
> > https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/sfc-dev/2016-
> October/003485.html
> > [3] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47001/
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> release mailing list
> rele...@lists.opendaylight.org
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
> _______________________________________________
> sfc-dev mailing list
> sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
>
_______________________________________________
sfc-dev mailing list
sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev

Reply via email to