If anyone is willing to try this out, here are my patches:
https://extranet.adestotech.com/soge-8.1.9-patch.tar
Let me know
From: Daniel Povey
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2019 6:59 PM
To: Ondrej Valousek
Cc: sge-disc...@liverpool.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [SGE-discuss] SGE systemd integration - can
an I send my patches somewhere so it can be possibly merged with the SoGE
main repo?
Thanks,
Ondrej
From: Ondrej Valousek
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2019 1:40 PM
To: 'us...@gridengine.org' mailto:us...@gridengine.org>>
Subject: SGE & systemd integration
Hi all,
I am thinking of making
mean for this email list and other resources hosted at
> liverpool?
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:43:51 +
> Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I have noticed most of the download links at:
> >
> >
Hello,
I have noticed most of the download links at:
https://arc.liv.ac.uk/trac/SGE
are broken. Can we have that fixed?
Thx,
Ondrej
-
The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential
and is designated solely for the attention of the intended recipient(s). If
Using 8.1.8. Will try 8.1.9, thanks...
O.
-Original Message-
From: William Hay [mailto:w@ucl.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 12:56 PM
To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
Cc: SGE-discuss@liv.ac.uk <sge-disc...@liverpool.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [SGE-dis
Hi List,
When running qstat, I am sometimes receiving messages like:
''ERROR: failed receiving gdi request response for mid=1 (got syncron message
receive timeout error)".
Also, qping - info shows warning/error and high number of qmaster clients (>
40) at times when I receive messages like
By default it's not consumable so therefore it is not enforced.
>-Original Message-
>From: juanesteban.jime...@mdc-berlin.de
>[mailto:juanesteban.jime...@mdc-berlin.de]
>Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 11:50 AM
>To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>; Re
Makes a sense to me.
By setting h_vmem to 0 you define shell limit for address space to 0 - which
means nothing can actually start as every malloc() will return E_NOMEM.
Simple.
>-Original Message-
>From: SGE-discuss [mailto:sge-discuss-boun...@liverpool.ac.uk] On Behalf Of
Hi List,
When running qstat -j -xml, qstat always return 0 - even in case
job_id is incorrect.
I guess we should return 1 in that case, right?
Ondrej
-
The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential
and is designated solely for the attention of the
much?
This way I believe we would get GE to show more accurate job exit status it
case it was killed due to the lack of memory.
Many thanks,
Ondrej
From: Reuti [mailto:re...@staff.uni-marburg.de]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 6:30 PM
To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
Cc: W
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 2:27 PM
> To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
> Cc: William Hay <w@ucl.ac.uk>; sge-discuss@liv.ac.uk disc...@liverpool.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: [SGE-discuss] Enforcing memory limit for job
>
>
> > Am 21.03.2017 um
age-
> From: Reuti [mailto:re...@staff.uni-marburg.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 2:05 PM
> To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
> Cc: William Hay <w@ucl.ac.uk>; sge-discuss@liv.ac.uk disc...@liverpool.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: [SGE-discuss]
--Original Message-
> From: William Hay [mailto:w@ucl.ac.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 4:18 PM
> To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
> Cc: sge-discuss@liv.ac.uk <sge-disc...@liverpool.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: [SGE-discuss] Enforcing memory limit for job
&
Hi List,
I need a help with setting default limits for jobs.
I would need something that would limit job memory consumption to say 20Gb but
was not consumable unless explicitly specified by a user.
I thought setting h_vmem attribute in GE complex configuration would do the
trick, but it is
> So you expect that the jobs should go to the BATCH queue (due to the setting
> in sge_request) and wait indefinitely to be scheduled.
> But you observe that they kick out soon with "Your "qrsh" request could not
> be scheduled, try again later.".
>
> Do you have a personal ~/.sge_request?
>
>
I mean "man sge_request"
-> so the outcome is what? Qrsh ignores sge_request file?
Could you clarify?
Thanks,
Ondrej
-Original Message-
From: Reuti [mailto:re...@staff.uni-marburg.de]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 12:55 PM
To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3gr
...
-Original Message-
From: Reuti [mailto:re...@staff.uni-marburg.de]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 12:25 PM
To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
Cc: sge-disc...@liverpool.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [SGE-discuss] Your "qrsh" request could not be scheduled, try
again later.
It's probably firewalld service running on qmaster.
Try to stop it or add exception
Otherwise GE has no problem running on Centos 7.
-Original Message-
From: SGE-discuss [mailto:sge-discuss-boun...@liverpool.ac.uk] On Behalf Of
Maximilian Friedersdorff
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017
Hi List,
I have a problem with a ghost jobs - these are (as per qstat) usually in state
'r' or 'dr' - so running, but in fact nothing is running on the specified node.
I can even reboot the node, but they do not vanish - still there.
They can be deleted, but it's still worrying as they are
Hi List,
I just enabled USE_CGROUPS execd parameters and I observe that
- Relevant job cgroup is created in /dev/cpuset/sge
- Task PIDs can not be found in /dev/cpuset/sge//tasks
What could be wrong?
I also use ENABLE_ADDGRP_KILL=true and USE_QSUB_GID=false, son of GE version
Hi list,
I have a strange problem. Jobs submitted to GE tend to crash and generate core
files. I want avoid generation of core files as they tend to hog our shared
storage, so I defined system-wide policy in /etc/security/limits.conf
My problem - if I submit the job normally via qrsh, core
...@liverpool.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 4:10 PM
To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
Cc: sge-discuss@liv.ac.uk <sge-disc...@liverpool.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [SGE-discuss] SGE 8.1.8 CGROUP question
Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com> writes:
> Hi List,
>
)
would naturally do the job for me.
Ondrej
-Original Message-
From: Ondrej Valousek
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 4:19 PM
To: 'Dave Love,,,' <d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk>
Cc: sge-discuss@liv.ac.uk <sge-disc...@liverpool.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: [SGE-discuss] SGE 8.1.8 C
/2012/05/grid-engine-cgroups-integration.html
Ondrej
-Original Message-
From: Reuti [mailto:re...@staff.uni-marburg.de]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 11:35 AM
To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
Cc: sge-discuss@liv.ac.uk <sge-disc...@liverpool.ac.uk>
Subject: Re:
ortunately as it would be the cleanest solution).
Ondrej
-Original Message-
From: Mark Dixon [mailto:m.c.di...@leeds.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 5:50 PM
To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valou...@s3group.com>
Cc: sge-disc...@liverpool.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [SGE-discuss] SGE 8.1.8
Hi List,
We have just started using SGE 8.1.8 with the CGROUP support - works well, but
I spotted that in spite of being CGROUP enabled, jobs are still submitted with
the additional GID attached to them.
My understanding that CGROUP will take care of tracking the job processes -
hence no need
26 matches
Mail list logo
