[winswitch] RHEL/CentOS repo packages

2021-07-13 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
Hi Antoine, The 4.2.1/4.3 update has caused a conflict in the RHEL/CentOS repo. You have both 4.2.1 and 4.3 package versions out there, but not a complete set. 'python3-xpra-*' has 4.3, but no matching 'xpra-*' package set so there is a package dependency failure. This also causes problems

Re: [winswitch] Fedora33 xpra h264 encoding support not working

2021-05-26 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 5/26/21 8:44 AM, Terry Barnaby via shifter-users wrote: Are you sure that hardware based H264/HEVC encoder/decoder usage license is not covered by the manufacturer/supplier of the hardware codecs ? Sorry, I was reading your message as "does my hardware allow me to freely use codecs" so

Re: [winswitch] Fedora33 xpra h264 encoding support not working

2021-05-26 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 5/26/21 8:17 AM, Terry Barnaby via shifter-users wrote: As a slight aside to this. My "dnf install xpra" from the Fedora33 repositories + rpmfusion + fedora-cisco-openh264 repositories does in fact have h264 and h265 support. So I presume the Fedora33 standard ffmpeg is being extended to

Re: [winswitch] Fedora33 xpra h264 encoding support not working

2021-05-26 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 5/26/21 8:24 AM, Antoine Martin via shifter-users wrote: Disabling the codecs at build time is not enough if we want to be pedantic. Let's digress a bit more then: why not? As someone who has worked with patented software and seen what Fedora Legal (a.k.a. Red Hat Legal) requires for

Re: [winswitch] Fedora33 xpra h264 encoding support not working

2021-05-26 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 5/26/21 7:43 AM, Antoine Martin via shifter-users wrote: For the sake of completeness, this is not 100% accurate: ffmpeg can be built under the GPL license and without the nonfree codecs. xpra's ffmpeg encoder which we are discussing in this thread can be enabled without those. Whether that's

Re: [winswitch] Fedora33 xpra h264 encoding support not working

2021-05-26 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 5/26/21 2:52 AM, Terry Barnaby via shifter-users wrote: Is there any reason why the Fedora system packages should be so different ? I can see they wouldn't be so up-to-date but I would have thought the Fedora maintainer would take the upstream as close as possible. It would be a better user

Re: [winswitch] Proxy stops responding after about a week

2021-02-23 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 2/23/21 9:36 AM, Antoine Martin via shifter-users wrote: You may want to run your proxy with "-d network" or even "-d all" and see if anything comes up. I'll try. Are you certain that this problems occurs after a certain amount of time rather than an amount of connections? It could be a

[winswitch] Proxy stops responding after about a week

2021-02-23 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
Hi, After about a week the Xpra Proxy stops responding to connection requests. The last time was 6 days. This issue has occurred multiple times. Trying to connect a web browser to port 14500 results in a time out. Trying to use openssl s_client :14500 results in a timeout. The port on the

Re: [winswitch] [ANNOUNCE] Xpra 4.0.6: many fixes, none critical

2021-01-05 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 1/4/21 11:34 PM, Antoine Martin via shifter-users wrote: Thanks for the report, this regression has been fixed: https://xpra.org/trac/changeset/28306 You can just run `yum update` to get updated packages with this fix. Thank you for the quick fix. That fixed the issue and it is now running.

Re: [winswitch] [ANNOUNCE] Xpra 4.0.6: many fixes, none critical

2021-01-04 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 12/31/20 7:09 AM, Antoine Martin via shifter-users wrote: Hi, This release fixes a large number of bugs but none of them are critical, so there is no urgency to update if you were not affected. That said, quite a few of the issues which have been fixed greatly enhance the user experience.

Re: [winswitch] Random connection drops in browser client

2020-12-09 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 12/8/20 11:56 PM, Antoine Martin via shifter-users wrote: I believe that the "client connection lost" messages shown here can only come from a proxy server. Are you running via a proxy server? And if so, have you tried without? The proxy server log may well have the details you need (run "-d

Re: [winswitch] Random connection drops in browser client

2020-12-08 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 11/30/20 11:29 PM, Antoine Martin via shifter-users wrote: Does this also occur if you connect a regular python client to the same session? I have not tried it yet, so I installed the 4.0.5 Windows client. After a few minutes the thick client also disconnects. In this instance I was using

[winswitch] Random connection drops in browser client

2020-11-30 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
Hi, I have had an issue with Xpra dropping and reconnecting sessions while using applications inside the web browser client. I have experienced this for several months and logs do not show a reason. Currently I'm using Xpra 4.0.5. I can leave a session open for hours without reconnect

Re: [winswitch] Disable TCP on systemd socket activation

2020-11-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 11/24/20 8:56 AM, Antoine Martin via shifter-users wrote: Try replacing "--tcp-auth=$TCP_AUTH" with "--wss-auth=sys" We could make this the default too I guess - though it may be confusing to see an auth option defined for a socket type that isn't used by default. Setting wss-auth allows

Re: [winswitch] Disable TCP on systemd socket activation

2020-11-24 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 11/24/20 8:11 AM, Antoine Martin via shifter-users wrote: Version 4.0.5 is the latest stable release. Beta builds can be found here: https://xpra.org/beta/ Once the fix is verified, please comment in that ticket and I will backport this change to the stable versions. Duh. :( I tested the

Re: [winswitch] Disable TCP on systemd socket activation

2020-11-23 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 10/23/20 4:05 AM, Antoine Martin via shifter-users wrote: Right. Based on your request, I have just added a simple way to make this work: https://www.xpra.org/trac/ticket/2914 You can grab the latest centos8 beta builds which have this change already included. I tested this today using the

Re: [winswitch] Disable TCP on systemd socket activation

2020-10-23 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 10/23/20 4:05 AM, Antoine Martin via shifter-users wrote: Right. Based on your request, I have just added a simple way to make this work: https://www.xpra.org/trac/ticket/2914 You can grab the latest centos8 beta builds which have this change already included. Great! Thank you!

[winswitch] Disable TCP on systemd socket activation

2020-10-22 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
Hi, I'm using the Xpra 4.x packages from the official Xpra repo on RHEL 8. I'm also using the provided systemd socket and service. This enables the listening socket at port 14500 to respond to plain TCP and SSL requests. I would like to disable support for plain TCP, but I do not see a

Re: [winswitch] multiple users with html5

2020-03-12 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 3/12/20 10:34 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: So, you're using the connect.html form, but with what options? They are not terminating with the HTML5 client. The checkboxes for "Terminate server..." are grey, but checked. (maybe they should not be checked) The "terminate .." options are only

Re: [winswitch] multiple users with html5

2020-03-12 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 3/12/20 9:32 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: One final issue: Sessions are not closing when the user disconnects. I am using 'xpra proxy --bind-tcp=0.0.0.0:port --html=on --tcp-auth=pam --exit-with-client=yes --terminate-children=yes "exit-with-client" is not honoured by the proxy server,

Re: [winswitch] multiple users with html5

2020-03-12 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 3/11/20 11:02 PM, Antoine Martin wrote: That's odd, the module is present with a default 64-bit CentOS 7 installation of python2-xpra-server-3.0.6-0.r25195: ls -la /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xpra/server/pam.so You can test that it imports successfully with: python -c "from

Re: [winswitch] multiple users with html5

2020-03-11 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 3/10/20 11:05 PM, Antoine Martin wrote: The xpra proxy can do pretty much the same thing. ie as root: xpra proxy --bind-tcp=0.0.0.0:1 --tcp-auth=sys Then you can authenticate as individual unix users on that proxy and request a new sessions. Thanks! This is what I was looking for. It's

Re: [winswitch] multiple users with html5

2020-03-10 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
On 3/9/20 7:06 AM, Antoine Martin via shifter-users wrote: Do you want them to be able to start new sessions or only connect to existing ones? They need to start their own sessions. Currently a single Xpra session starts under a single user so things like gnome-terminal or IDEs start in the

[winswitch] multiple users with html5

2020-03-02 Thread Michael Cronenworth via shifter-users
Hi, Is there an existing product or workflow that someone has created to handle multiple users logging in through the HTML5 interface? I would like to have each user logging in to their own Xpra instance. The only way I see to do it now is start up Xpra for each user, but this seems