On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Vincent Leloup wrote:
> Hello Irmen,
>
> As stated in the patch, it is based on revision 507 of Pyro 3. It was
> the head some days ago.
>
> [...]
>
> I read that some features are still missing in Pyro 4 ; I can check if
> there are used by shinken and propose a pa
Hello Irmen,
As stated in the patch, it is based on revision 507 of Pyro 3. It was
the head some days ago.
I can support you about IPv6 network but only on linux / unix. My
knowledge about Windows is very limited.
If Pyro 3 is really feature freezed, I can try to port the patch to Pyro
4 ; I do
erf, effectively..
better read the main headers next time ;)
bye
2011/7/4 Ronny Lindner
> Hi!
>
> He sent the email to pyro-c...@lists.sourceforge.net and only a cc went
> to the shinken list - so I think he's already doing what you said ;)
>
> Bye, Ronny
>
> Am 04.07.2011 19:10, schrieb Grég
Hi!
He sent the email to pyro-c...@lists.sourceforge.net and only a cc went
to the shinken list - so I think he's already doing what you said ;)
Bye, Ronny
Am 04.07.2011 19:10, schrieb Grégory Starck:
> Hi,
>
> I had a look at it and the patch is already very clean. the involved problem
> doesn
Hi,
I had a look at it and the patch is already very clean. the involved problem
doesn't effectively require that much. More over if you have tested it with
shinken it's again better.
so why don't you try to submit it to Pyro 3 dev mailing list (or anything
related) ? they could include it imho..
Hello,
I'm using a monitoring software called shinken which rely on Pyro 3 for
the communication between the many servers it contains. But, in my case,
some parts of the network between these servers are IPv6 only.
So, I created a patch against Pyro 3 to add the IPv6 support. I'm not a
python dev
