On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Francois Mikus wrote:
> [..]
> >>
> > There may (I don't know yet) be better ways to achieve this.
> >
> > Before implementing, please what some days. I'm already working on a new
> > logging module, but need to implement performance-tests.
> As mentioned earlier,
On 12-08-18 7:39 AM, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> Am 18.08.2012 06:30, schrieb Francois Mikus:
>> 1. Default logging level set to INFO instead of NOTSET which equates
>> to DEBUG in reality.
>>
> I suggest setting the defaullt level to WARNING. "INFO" is much to
> verbose, normally one is not int
Am 18.08.2012 06:30, schrieb Francois Mikus:
>
> 1. Default logging level set to INFO instead of NOTSET which equates
> to DEBUG in reality.
>
I suggest setting the defaullt level to WARNING. "INFO" is much to
verbose, normally one is not interested in all this stuff.
> 1. Default logging l
Hello,
Here are the proposed changes from less to more controversial:
1. Default logging level set to INFO instead of NOTSET which equates to
DEBUG in reality.
2. Default logging level of all INI files set to WARNING.
1. When there is a problem, users usually have a tracefile output,