Tom Eastep wrote:
> Products that end in '-ng' typically replace the product with the same
> name but without the '-ng'. That isn't going to happen here. So I prefer
> 'shorewall-pl'.
>
I agree! And I add that:
1) extensions like "-ng" are mostly marketing extension and Shorewall
does not need
Hi Tom,
Wanted to thank you on the recent post to help me with tcrules.
I have all my firewalls with two isp's and even the ones with one isp
working good. Voip was was my motive to learn this. Before I stuck
with the wondershaper which fit most of my needs. I have been so
busy lately, no time
Simon Hobson wrote:
> Tom Eastep wrote:
>
>> Eventually, I might break Shorewall into three pieces:
>>
>> - shorewall-common
>> - shorewall-shell
>> - shorewall-perl
>
> Now that does make sense.
>
As such time as I do this (maybe as early as Shorewall 4.0.0), I will be
looking for someone else
kBerry Wireless Handheld
-Original Message-
From: Simon Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:04:11
To:Shorewall Users
Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall4
Tom Eastep wrote:
>Eventually, I might break Shorewall into three pieces:
>
>- shore
Tom Eastep wrote:
>Eventually, I might break Shorewall into three pieces:
>
>- shorewall-common
>- shorewall-shell
>- shorewall-perl
Now that does make sense.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join Sourc
Simon Hobson wrote:
>
>
> I've been thinking about this on and off, and one twisted logic
> process says you should call the new package Shorewall2 ! At the
> moment we have 'Shorewall' version 3.4.2, the new package would be
> 'Shorewall2' version 1..
>
> I don't think that would be any less
Tom Eastep wrote:
>Shortly after I release Shorewall 3.4.2, I will be issuing the first release
>of the new development thread which I'm calling Shorewall4.
>
>I'm announcing the new product ahead of time so that people will have a
>chance to comment on the approach (and the product name) in advan
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:50:54AM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
>
> - The code should be hugely simpler to understand (any non-trivial
> program written in shell spends half the code working around the
> limitations of shell), which makes it much more practical for random
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 08:58:54PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> Perhaps 'shorewall-compiler' or something like that? That's the
> essential difference of this code, as far as I can see.
>
I don't like it. How about northwall, ridgewall, seawall or richwall?
:-)
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Rob
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:50:54AM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
> The good news:
>
> a) The compiler has a small disk footprint (although Perl is large).
> b) The compiler is very fast.
> c) The compiler generates a firewall script that uses iptables-restore;
> so the script is very fast.
Now that's
Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> Perhaps 'shorewall-compiler' or something like that? That's the
> essential difference of this code, as far as I can see.
>
I disagree. Shorewall has included a compiler since Shorewall 3.2 so the
fact that this product includes a compiler does not distinguish it from
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:37:39AM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
> Products that end in '-ng' typically replace the product with the same
> name but without the '-ng'. That isn't going to happen here. So I prefer
> 'shorewall-pl'.
Language-specific names are usually a bad idea in the long
run. There's
Henrique Cesar Ulbrich wrote:
> Historiadores acreditam que,
> em Sáb 24 Mar 2007, Vieri Di Paola disse:
>> Just a thought but considering the shorewall-lite
>> package title format one may also call it shorewall-ng
>> or shorewall-pl.
>> I prefer package names without numbers but that's just
>> m
Historiadores acreditam que,
em Sáb 24 Mar 2007, Vieri Di Paola disse:
> Just a thought but considering the shorewall-lite
> package title format one may also call it shorewall-ng
> or shorewall-pl.
> I prefer package names without numbers but that's just
> my opinion.
I agree.
The current stabl
Vieri Di Paola wrote:
> --- Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm announcing the new product ahead of time so that
>> people will have a
>> chance to comment on the approach (and the product
>> name) in advance of the
>> initial release.
>
> Just a thought but considering the shorewall-l
--- Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm announcing the new product ahead of time so that
> people will have a
> chance to comment on the approach (and the product
> name) in advance of the
> initial release.
Just a thought but considering the shorewall-lite
package title format one may a
Shortly after I release Shorewall 3.4.2, I will be issuing the first release
of the new development thread which I'm calling Shorewall4.
I'm announcing the new product ahead of time so that people will have a
chance to comment on the approach (and the product name) in advance of the
initial releas
17 matches
Mail list logo
