On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 04:56:54PM +0100, Simon Hobson wrote:
> SIP does stuff that IAX can't - specifically, SIP was designed to
> have the data and control as separate channels. That way, your
> registrar/pbx/whatever you want to call it does NOT have to also pass
> all the traffic. Eg, you ca
Kenneth Burgener wrote:
>Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> I subscribe only to the "NAT is awkward" school, not the "NAT is evil"
>> one, but SIP's a pretty stupid protocol even without NAT. There's just
>> no good excuse for the way it scatters traffic through unrelated ports
>> - it would have worked
