Re: [Shorewall-users] FW: IPsec Tunnel as Default Gateway for Branch Offices

2017-10-03 Thread Jason Timmins
Hi Tom, That's a shame. Are you thinking that others on the Shorewall mailing list might be able to help? We're looking to connect remote sites to a central Shorewall-based firewall and have their Internet traffic pass via that server (rather than going direct.) However, Tom and I can't

Re: [Shorewall-users] FW: IPsec Tunnel as Default Gateway for Branch Offices

2017-10-03 Thread Tom Eastep
Hi Jason, There is an article at https://libreswan.org/wiki/Subnet_extrusion that discusses this configuration. The solution is expressed in *Swan syntax; the basic features are: - Both the left and right subnets are 0.0.0.0/0. - On the responder side, a 'passthrough' policy is added to allow

Re: [Shorewall-users] FW: IPsec Tunnel as Default Gateway for Branch Offices

2017-10-03 Thread Bill Shirley
Post your Shorewall config files. zones interfaces hosts tunnels snat I've found running conntrack is sometimes helpful in diagnosing problems. 'conntrack -L 2>&1 | grep 10.1.4.41' Bill On 10/3/2017 5:37 AM, Jason Timmins wrote: Hi Tom, That's a shame. Are you thinking that others on the