On 04/05/2018 07:50 PM, Igor Sverkos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am on Debian Stretch system with multiple IP addresses and
> shorewall-5.0.15.6.
>
> I have set "/etc/shorewall/snat" to
>
>> SNAT(1.2.3.4)0.0.0.0/0 eth0:+ip_restricted_endpoints[dst]
>
> My expectation:
>
> Whenever I
On 04/06/2018 09:42 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 07:50 PM, Igor Sverkos wrote:
>
> It is a bug that was corrected in Shorewall 5.1.7.
>
Attached is the patch.
patch /usr/share/shorewall/Shorewall/Rules.pm < commit-3b373f3
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Q: What do you get when you
# ip address
7: he-ipv6@NONE: mtu 1480 qdisc noqueue state
UNKNOWN qlen 1
link/sit 50.47.100.167 peer 216.218.226.238
inet6 2001:470:a:c3::2/64 scope global
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::322f:64a7/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreve
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On April 6, 2018 11:18 AM, colony.three--- via Shorewall-users
wrote:
> # ip address
> 7: he-ipv6@NONE: mtu 1480 qdisc noqueue state
> UNKNOWN qlen 1
> link/sit 50.47.100.167 peer 216.218.226.238
> inet6 2001:470:a:c3::2/64 scope global
>valid_l
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On April 6, 2018 11:58 AM, wrote:
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On April 6, 2018 11:44 AM, Tom Eastep teas...@shorewall.net wrote:
>
> > > After shorewall6 clear, ping6 just hangs.
> > >
> > > ping6 google.com
> > >
> > >
>
On 04/06/2018 01:22 PM, colony.three--- via Shorewall-users wrote:
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On April 6, 2018 11:58 AM, wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>>
>> On April 6, 2018 11:44 AM, Tom Eastep teas...@shorewall.net wrote:
>>
After shorewall6 clear, p
Hi Tom,
thank you!
I took the opportunity, created my own Debian packages and upgraded to 5.1.12.3.
If the Debian maintainer is following this list: Would be nice to see
a package bump in 9.5 :)
--
Regards,
Igor
--
C
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On April 6, 2018 2:32 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>
>
> On 04/06/2018 01:22 PM, colony.three--- via Shorewall-users wrote:
>
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> >
> > On April 6, 2018 11:58 AM, colony.th...@protonmail.ch wrote:
> >
> > > ‐‐‐ Original Mess
