gt; To: Jason Timmins <ja...@mbmltd.co.uk>
> Cc: Shorewall Users <shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: FW: [Shorewall-users] IPsec Tunnel as Default Gateway for
> Branch Offices
>
> On 10/01/2017 01:27 PM, Jason Timmins wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
&
g NAT'd by the firewall. Anyone else got any ideas?
Cheers
Jason.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teas...@shorewall.net]
Sent: 02 October 2017 17:11
To: Jason Timmins <ja...@mbmltd.co.uk>
Cc: Shorewall Users <shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: FW: [Sho
--Original Message-
> From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teas...@shorewall.net]
> Sent: 02 October 2017 17:11
> To: Jason Timmins <ja...@mbmltd.co.uk>
> Cc: Shorewall Users <shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: FW: [Shorewall-users] IPsec Tunnel as Default Gateway f
all-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: FW: [Shorewall-users] IPsec Tunnel as Default Gateway for Branch
Offices
On 10/01/2017 01:27 PM, Jason Timmins wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> This trace file is a bit longer than I'd have liked but you should be able to
> find references to my ma
On 10/01/2017 01:27 PM, Jason Timmins wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> This trace file is a bit longer than I'd have liked but you should be able to
> find references to my machine, 10.1.4.41, trying to ping 8.8.8.8.
>
Okay -- you have no IPSEC policy covering these packets. What appears to
be happening
