F> > I created a ticket on this topic:
F> > http://shr-project.org/trac/ticket/572
F> >
F> > Please review and add additional modules.
F> >
F>
F> Hey, i dont have access to add comments or edit, so could please add
F> the following:
F>
F> * all the gadget drivers (g_file_storage) (g_serial?)
F> *
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Sven Klomp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created a ticket on this topic:
> http://shr-project.org/trac/ticket/572
>
> Please review and add additional modules.
>
Hey, i dont have access to add comments or edit, so could please add the
following:
* all the gadget drivers (g_
Hi,
I created a ticket on this topic:
http://shr-project.org/trac/ticket/572
Please review and add additional modules.
Sven
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 09:29:20 Al Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009, piratebab wrote:
> > For sure not all the modules are used. I have seen many with file
>
On Tuesday 04 August 2009, piratebab wrote:
> For sure not all the modules are used. I have seen many with file
> systems support. Are they all usefull ? I dont think so.
What? You've never attached a USB HDD or card reader to your Freerunner ;-)
I agree they probably shouldn't be in the lite imag
For sure not all the modules are used. I have seen many with file
systems support. Are they all usefull ? I dont think so.
Sven Klomp a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> is it necessary to include all modules in the lite image? I thought the main
> advantage of separate packages for each module is to only ship t
Hi,
is it necessary to include all modules in the lite image? I thought the main
advantage of separate packages for each module is to only ship the necessary.
If I need e.g. nfs I can do an opgk install...
Furthermore, applications can depend on the kernel packages. So I don't have
to think abo
