On Thu, 1 Aug 2002 19:02:53 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Not really. I'm talking about something else in fact. You can create
>> >a unit containing array of messages, and possibly a function
>> >returning individual messages. That unit could be compiled into a
>> >DLL, and such a DLL cou
Hi!
> I'm getting off-topic here, but I suspect WarpVision can only be
>used to play DivX avi files, not real DVD films. At least this is
>true for the version I have here (0.0.12).
Download the latest (gui or cli) from http://www.laemmlin.net/mirror/
They both can play DVD.
tam
--
eCS 1.01,
From: "Yuri Prokushev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date sent: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 16:35:04 -0400 (EDT)
Priority: Normal
Subject:Re: [Sibyl] NL
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 22:51:37 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Not really. I'm talking about something else in fact. You can create
>a unit containing array of messages, and possibly a function
>returning individual messages. That unit could be compiled into a
>DLL, and such a DLL could be lin
From: "Yuri Prokushev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date sent: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:58:09 -0400 (EDT)
Priority: Normal
Subject:Re: [Sibyl] NL
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:26:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >> >> Disadvantages:
>> > Regarding resource compiler - well, this
>> >one is _not_ really needed, at least not in the beginning (for this,
>> >at least). However, we'll need resource compiler later anyway as well
>> > - how would y
From: "Yuri Prokushev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date sent: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:44:02 -0400 (EDT)
Priority: Normal
Subject:Re: [Sibyl] NL
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:46:30 -0400 (EDT), Yuri Prokushev wrote:
>BTW, I see interface support fo COM/CORBA. Is needed to add same support for SOM? As
>I know SOM is more CORBA than COM.
Yes in fact SOM is a (today old) implementation of CORBA. That's the
reason why I think it's possible to repl
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 23:42:16 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > 2) I propose to use resourcestrings stored in DLLs (dynamically
>> >loaded, of course).
>> And now required at least resource compiler and linker.
> Resourcestrings don't necessarily have to be placed in real .RES, in
>fact (as s
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 23:42:16 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I see interface support fo COM/CORBA. Is needed to add same support for SOM? As I
know SOM is more CORBA than COM.
---
To unsubscribe yourself from this list, send the following message
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubsc
From: "Yuri Prokushev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date sent: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 22:24:50 -0400 (EDT)
Priority: Normal
Subject:Re: [Sibyl] NL
On Sat, 20 Jul 2002 10:37:34 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >>2All: NLS support too stupid. I'm planning to migrate to native msg
>> >>files instead if resources. Any comments?
>> >don't know, what's the problem with NLS?
>> Well. All messages placed in resources (as for class libs, as for
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo
