Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview ENDING: 10/21/2015)

On Oct 7, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Sean Turner wrote: > We’ll need to figure out what to do about the I-D.sidr-as-migration reference > it’s in the “IESG Dead” state. Thanks for the heads up, we’ll investigate with the AD. —Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair > > I guess s3.2 is going

Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview ENDING: 10/21/2015)

Speaking as regular ol’ member On Oct 7, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Sean Turner wrote: > We’ll need to figure out what to do about the I-D.sidr-as-migration reference > it’s in the “IESG Dead” state. > > I guess s3.2 is going to match whatever updates are made to > bgpsec-protocol-14.

Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview ENDING: 10/21/2015)

On Oct 8, 2015, at 5:14 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote: > > On Oct 7, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Sean Turner wrote: > >> We’ll need to figure out what to do about the I-D.sidr-as-migration >> reference it’s in the “IESG Dead” state. > > Thanks for the heads up, we’ll

Re: [sidr] preventing SKI collisions

At Wed, 7 Oct 2015 09:22:40 -0400, Sean Turner wrote: > > On Oct 06, 2015, at 08:30, Sandra Murphy wrote: >> On Oct 5, 2015, at 4:36 PM, David Mandelberg wrote: >>> >>> 4. Add text warning relying parties to detect malicious CAs that >>> cause too many

Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04 - " Revised I-D Needed "

> On 5 Oct 2015, at 2:03 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote: > > The draft draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04 was approved by the IESG, provided > the comments received during IETF Last Call were addressed. > > The IETF Last Call comments were noted to the sidr list in >

Re: [sidr] comments on draft-ymbk-sidr-transfer-01???

Sandy, I provided detailed comments on this document on June 2. Randy later said he didn't see them, so I resent (just to Randy) on July 7. Steve ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

[sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-05.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF. Title : Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator Authors : Geoff

[sidr] comments on draft-ymbk-sidr-transfer-01???

The draft draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered speaks forcefully of the potential for damage if a certificate over claims, i.e., claims more resources than its parent. The draft discusses how that could result from a failure of timing in a transfer of resources. In a presentation in