[sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing of the IETF. Title : BGPsec Operational Considerations Author : Randy Bush Filename:

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-10

> M4. Still in Section 7: “To prevent exposure of the internals of BGP > Confederations [RFC5065], a BGPsec speaker which is a Member-AS of a > Confederation MUST NOT sign updates sent to another Member-AS of the > same Confederation.” This is another case where the BGPSec spec says > something

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-10

alvaro, > In thinking about this point some more…what about > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm? Isn’t that supposed to address the private > space? > > M4. Still in Section 7: “To prevent exposure of the internals of BGP > Confederations [RFC5065], a BGPsec speaker which is a Member-AS of a >

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-10

Randy: Hi! In thinking about this point some more…what about draft-ietf-sidr-slurm? Isn’t that supposed to address the private space? Thanks! Alvaro. On 12/2/16, 12:56 PM, "Randy Bush" > wrote: M4. Still in Section 7: “To prevent exposure of the

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-18

That workd for me. Thanks! Alvaro. On 12/6/16, 4:08 PM, "Sean Turner" > wrote: I concur and I’ve got an editor’s copy with all the changes incorporated. Unless I hear otherwise I’ll hold off on posting until we’ve collected and addressed all of the

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-18

I concur and I’ve got an editor’s copy with all the changes incorporated. Unless I hear otherwise I’ll hold off on posting until we’ve collected and addressed all of the other IETF LC comments. spt > On Dec 05, 2016, at 11:37, Steve KENT wrote: > > Alvaro, > >