All three updated to address issues that came up during IESG review,
along with a few items from directorate reviews that came in during
the same timeframe.
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
> As Terry mentions below, these changes removed “the quality of a
> mandatory to implement retrieval mechanism”: rsync is no longer
> mandatory to implement, but neither is RRDP.
this is gonna work out really well for distributed clients and
distributed servers where every client must to talk to
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing of the IETF.
Title : The Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) to
Router Protocol, Version 1
Authors : Randy Bush
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing of the IETF.
Title : An Out-Of-Band Setup Protocol For RPKI Production
Services
Author : Rob Austein
Filename
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing of the IETF.
Title : A Publication Protocol for the Resource Public Key
Infrastructure (RPKI)
Authors : Samuel Weiler
Alvaro,
Sorry I faukled to rely when you posted you comment on this topic to the SIDR
list. I don't support revising 6480, 6481, and 7730 to remove mandatory support
for rsynch, at this time. The issue, for me, is not whether rysnc is better or
worse than the delta protocol. The issue is that
Hi!
I just want to provide a little bit more background on the topic below – and
ask the Chairs to take an action to confirm with the WG.
During the discussion resulting from my AD review of this document [1], the
topic of whether the intent of the document was to replace rsync or not came up
