Hi wg,
On Jan 10, 2014, at 9:33 PM, Murphy, Sandra sandra.mur...@parsons.com wrote:
Can others please look at this and speak up as to whether you do or do not
support adoption?
+1, support discussing this in a document
Regards,
Tim
___
sidr
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Murphy, Sandra
sandra.mur...@parsons.com wrote:
There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But four is
not a strong indication of wg wishes here.
Can others please look at this and speak up as to whether you do or do not
support
Support adoption.
Regards,
Keyur
On 1/10/14 12:33 PM, Murphy, Sandra sandra.mur...@parsons.com wrote:
There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But four
is not a strong indication of wg wishes here.
Can others please look at this and speak up as to whether you do or do
support adoption
-Bhavani
On 1/13/14 5:41 AM, Murphy, Sandra wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Randy Bush said:
There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But
four is not a strong indication of wg wishes here.
note that the wg meeting in berlin asked for a requirements
I support adoption. I think it is important work.
Roque
On Jan 10, 2014, at 9:33 PM, Murphy, Sandra sandra.mur...@parsons.com wrote:
There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But four is
not a strong indication of wg wishes here.
Can others please look at this and
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Randy Bush said:
There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But
four is not a strong indication of wg wishes here.
note that the wg meeting in berlin asked for a requirements draft
I hear you, and I heard the comments. But the wg is supposed to
I don't recall if I responded before, but I will now.
I support development of a requirements/use cases doc, so we might as
well begin
with this one.
Steve
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But
four is not a strong indication of wg wishes here.
note that the wg meeting in berlin asked for a requirements draft
randy
pgp_l4NC6UrXQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
sidr
Yes, support adoption.
I'm willing to review and provide feedback.
Sriram
Howdy gentle WG folks,
The authors of:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00
are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed text.
It
would be good if other folk also agreed
+1, support adoption of the requirements document
On 11/26/13, 7:39 PM, Chris Morrow wrote:
Howdy gentle WG folks,
The authors of:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00
are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed
text. It would be good if
On Nov 26, 2013, at 8:39 PM, Chris Morrow morr...@ops-netman.net wrote:
Howdy gentle WG folks,
The authors of:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00
are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed
text. It would be good if other folk also agreed
Still think that there is work to be done on the draft
you betcha. send edit(s).
[ fwiw: i have discoovered an undocumented secret (thanks to sam and
henrik) that the Related Work section on the sidr web page is not
under control of the chairs. docs are automatically added if the
third
Howdy gentle WG folks,
The authors of:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases-00
are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed
text. It would be good if other folk also agreed about the adoption.
The abstract says:
There are a number of critical
note that this draft was written in response to the wg meeting in berlin
asking for requirements before entering the forest of steve kent's
multiple proposals.
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
14 matches
Mail list logo
