Re: [sidr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-04-06 Thread Di Ma
Benjamin, Thanks very much for your comments. Please see my responses in lines. > 在 2018年3月31日,01:54,Benjamin Kaduk 写道: > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line

Re: [sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-04-06 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Di, On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Di Ma wrote: > Alissa, > > Thanks very much for your comments. > > Is BCP 14 exactly the same document as RFC 2119? It was, until https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8174 was added to BCP 14. That's the process doc that says readers don't have

Re: [sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-04-06 Thread Di Ma
Spencer, Thanks for your explanation. Di > 在 2018年4月6日,23:06,Spencer Dawkins at IETF 写道: > > Hi, Di, > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Di Ma wrote: > Alissa, > > Thanks very much for your comments. > > Is BCP 14 exactly the same document as

Re: [sidr] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-04-06 Thread Di Ma
Alexey, Thanks very much for your comments. Please see authors' responses in lines. > 在 2018年4月2日,18:47,Alexey Melnikov 写道: > > Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the

Re: [sidr] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-04-06 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 7:19 AM, Di Ma wrote: > > > > contained by any prefix in any or > > in file Z. > > > > OK, so you are going to error out even if there are assertions which are > > identical? > > > > > > Duplicate assertions are idempotent, but the RPKI to

Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-04-06 Thread Di Ma
Ben, Thanks very much for your comments. Please see authors' responses in lines. > 在 2018年4月4日,03:43,Ben Campbell 写道: > > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line

Re: [sidr] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-04-06 Thread Di Ma
Warren, Thanks very much for your comments. Please see my responses in lines. > 在 2018年4月2日,05:02,Warren Kumari 写道: > > Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact

Re: [sidr] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-04-06 Thread Di Ma
Eric, Thanks very much for your comments. Please see authors' responses in lines. > 在 2018年4月3日,00:56,Eric Rescorla 写道: > > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line

Re: [sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-04-06 Thread Di Ma
Alissa, Thanks very much for your comments. Is BCP 14 exactly the same document as RFC 2119? Di > 在 2018年4月5日,02:00,Alissa Cooper 写道: > > Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep

Re: [sidr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

2018-04-06 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:15:28PM +0800, Di Ma wrote: > Benjamin, > > Thanks very much for your comments. > > Please see my responses in lines. > > > > 在 2018年3月31日,01:54,Benjamin Kaduk 写道: > > [trimming lots of stuff that looks good] > > I also wonder if we would benefit