Re: [sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)
Hi, Ben, Thanks for reminding us:-) Di > 在 2018年4月10日，02:28，Ben Campbell 写道： > > > >> On Apr 6, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF >> wrote: >> >> Hi, Di, >> >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Di Ma wrote: >> Alissa, >> >> Thanks very much for your comments. >> >> Is BCP 14 exactly the same document as RFC 2119? >> >> It was, until https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8174 was added to BCP 14. >> That's the process doc that says readers don't have to figure out whether >> "must" is normative, etc. >> >> Spencer, who is not Alissa, but had a second to answer the question > > Also not Alissa (or Spencer), but to extend the answer a bit: RFC 8174 > includes new boilerplate for treating only the upper case versions as > keywords. > > Thanks! > > Ben. ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)
> On Apr 6, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF > wrote: > > Hi, Di, > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Di Ma wrote: > Alissa, > > Thanks very much for your comments. > > Is BCP 14 exactly the same document as RFC 2119? > > It was, until https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8174 was added to BCP 14. > That's the process doc that says readers don't have to figure out whether > "must" is normative, etc. > > Spencer, who is not Alissa, but had a second to answer the question Also not Alissa (or Spencer), but to extend the answer a bit: RFC 8174 includes new boilerplate for treating only the upper case versions as keywords. Thanks! Ben. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)
Spencer, Thanks for your explanation. Di > 在 2018年4月6日，23:06，Spencer Dawkins at IETF 写道： > > Hi, Di, > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Di Ma wrote: > Alissa, > > Thanks very much for your comments. > > Is BCP 14 exactly the same document as RFC 2119? > > It was, until https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8174 was added to BCP 14. > That's the process doc that says readers don't have to figure out whether > "must" is normative, etc. > > Spencer, who is not Alissa, but had a second to answer the question ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)
Hi, Di, On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Di Ma wrote: > Alissa, > > Thanks very much for your comments. > > Is BCP 14 exactly the same document as RFC 2119? It was, until https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8174 was added to BCP 14. That's the process doc that says readers don't have to figure out whether "must" is normative, etc. Spencer, who is not Alissa, but had a second to answer the question ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Re: [sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)
Alissa, Thanks very much for your comments. Is BCP 14 exactly the same document as RFC 2119? Di > 在 2018年4月5日，02:00，Alissa Cooper 写道： > > Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-slurm/ > > > > -- > COMMENT: > -- > > Please cite BCP 14 rather than RFC 2119, assuming you intend for normative > keywords to have their normative meaning in uppercase only. > > > ___ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
[sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-slurm/ -- COMMENT: -- Please cite BCP 14 rather than RFC 2119, assuming you intend for normative keywords to have their normative meaning in uppercase only. ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
