Sophie,
My calculation for 64-atoms:
Why do you have to go to 64 atoms to get this kind of quantities? The unit
cell should suffice. Nevertheless:
1) Lattice Constant: I changed the lattice parameter and find the energy
and plotting that I find 5.45 Ang, instead of 5.40 as reported in the
Thanks a lot for outstanding support and help from the group.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Sophia Nishad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I am a new user of SIESTA. I have been trying to reproduce the results for
Si as mention in Soler et. al 2002 paper, before I go for my actual
Hi Sophia,
I am by no means an expert, but I would try increasing the Mesh Cutoff. I
usually use 300 Ry, but your system is quite large. Try 150 Ry and see what
happens.
Cheers,
Marty
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Sophia Nishad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks a lot for outstanding
Hi,
I am a new user of SIESTA. I have been trying to reproduce the results for
Si as mention in Soler et. al 2002 paper, before I go for my actual
calculations.
I have used the DZP Basis mentioned at
http://www.uam.es/departamentos/ciencias/fismateriac/siesta/
Pseudopotential at
4 matches
Mail list logo