Dear all :
I have one question about siesta.
I used siesta 2.0 version and system is a Ru
complex(Creutz-Taube ion) which has two redox site on
Ru atom.
One is 4d^6 :
t2g(dxy + dyz + dxz) was supposed to be 6
electrons,
eg(dz2 + dx2-y2) was supposed to be zero .
And the other
Dear all :
I used siesta 2.0 version and system is a Ru
complex(Creutz-Taube ion) which has two redox site on
Ru atom.
One is 4d^6 :
t2g(dxy + dyz + dxz) was supposed to be 6
electrons,
eg(dz2 + dx2-y2) was supposed to be zero .
And the other one is 4d^5 :
t2g was
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Cheng Pin Yen wrote:
| Dear all :
| I have one question about siesta.
| I used siesta 2.0 version and system is a Ru
| complex(Creutz-Taube ion) which has two redox site on
| Ru atom.
| One is 4d^6 :
| t2g(dxy + dyz + dxz) was supposed to be 6
| electrons,
|
I'm running 2.0.2-rc9 on an Intel machine, the flags for ifort are -O3 -ip
-tpp7 -xT -axT. No segmentation faults in either Broyden mixing or
relaxation. Although I have to admit that the k-point parallelization isn't
working, only parallelization over orbitals :)
2008/3/27, Marcos Verissimo
Hi,
I am a new user of SIESTA. I have been trying to reproduce the results for
Si as mention in Soler et. al 2002 paper, before I go for my actual
calculations.
I have used the DZP Basis mentioned at
http://www.uam.es/departamentos/ciencias/fismateriac/siesta/
Pseudopotential at
5 matches
Mail list logo