Re: [SIESTA-L] Error in Cholesky factorisation in cdiag

2019-02-27 Por tôpico sullah
Hi, I'm not sure what you are going to calculate and if you are sure that your structure is not periodic along a specific axis (z as per the image), you can take sufficient vacuum space i.e to increase the magnitude of that specific vector. It would no longer be periodic in that direction. Best

[SIESTA-L] Folding of H and S is implicitly performed

2019-02-27 Por tôpico Mina Sedighi
Dear Siesta users and developers, Thank you for all of your advice. I am using Siesta version 4.1-b3 on Compute Canada (graham) cluster. I faced the following error at the first of my CG simulation: Folding of H and S is implicitly performed As I read in the archive of mailing list, it is a

Re: [SIESTA-L] Test shows "DIFFERENCE FOUND"

2019-02-27 Por tôpico Andrés Lizano Villalobos
I see, I'll check them. Thank you very much. Andrés Lizano Villalobos El mar., 26 feb. 2019 15:03, Nick Papior escribió: > Many of them *should* be very small. There are floating point round-off > errors which makes it very hard to reproduce exactly the same numbers. > So you should look at whi

Re: [SIESTA-L] Removing periodic boundary condition

2019-02-27 Por tôpico Nick Papior
You can't, per see. :) TranSiesta allows one to remove periodic boundary conditions by adding a semi-infinite direction where a truly bulk semi-infinite electrode is placed. Siesta, however, intrinsically solves the potential in a periodic box. Den tir. 26. feb. 2019 kl. 22.05 skrev Mina Sedighi