Re: [SIESTA-L] [***RedIris: Posible SPAM***] [***RedIris: Posible SPAM***] Re: TBtrans output

2022-03-11 Por tôpico Neculai PLUGARU
Hi, All I have the following flags in the input: section for TBT :  ... TBT.DOS.A.All true TS.SolutionMethod btd TS.BTD.Pivot atom+rev-CM+Left %block TBT.k diag 3 3 1 %endblock %block TBT.Contours line %endblock TBT.Contours %block TBT.Contour.line part line from -15. eV to 10. eV delta 0.02

[SIESTA-L] [***RedIris: Posible SPAM***] [***RedIris: Posible SPAM***] Re: [***RedIris: Posible SPAM***] [***RedIris: Posible SPAM***] Re: TBtrans output

2022-03-11 Por tôpico Nick Papior
Please see my response 2 days ago, it seems that you are missing flags in the input file. /Nick On Thu, 10 Mar 2022, 22:02 Neculai PLUGARU, wrote: > > Hi, Nick > > Thank you, very much, for the checks and your time. > > 1) your scat.fdf does not ask for transmission eigenvalues. I.e. I can't >

Re: [SIESTA-L] Transmission spectrum varies greatly with TBT.Contours.Eta

2022-03-11 Por tôpico Sukhito Teh
Hi Nick, Noted, and thank you for your reply! best regards Sukhito Teh National Tsing Hua University On Sat, Mar 5, 2022 at 5:01 AM Nick Papior wrote: > Hi, > > No, I would say you need to conduct more experiments in trying to > understand your system's sensitivity and convergences a bit

Re: [SIESTA-L] [***RedIris: Posible SPAM***] [***RedIris: Posible SPAM***] Re: TBtrans output

2022-03-11 Por tôpico Nick Papior
Hi, And could you attach the input and output again... The last output clearly showed that you had not put those flags in. So I am guessing you are doing the same thing again Please, always attach input and output! And you write something about tbt.t.eig true which does not make sense... As