Nick Papior ; siesta-l
Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] TRANSIESTA QUESTIONs Concerning unit cell with skew
lattice vectors
Thank you again and really appreciate the content behind your answers.
Even question one that i could not explain clearly you were able to answer that.
Speaking of question one, you s
-requ...@uam.es on behalf of Nick
Papior
Sent: Friday, 13 December 2019 8:01 PM
To: siesta-l
Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] TRANSIESTA QUESTIONs Concerning unit cell with skew
lattice vectors
Den tor. 12. dec. 2019 kl. 22.06 skrev El-abed Haidar
mailto:ehai2...@uni.sydney.edu.au>>:
Thank you
Den tor. 12. dec. 2019 kl. 22.06 skrev El-abed Haidar <
ehai2...@uni.sydney.edu.au>:
> Thank you again for the reply
> For question 2 isn’t it defined as Ky and Kz so I’m not sure I get your
> point that it is fine
>
I don't understand what you mean. :)
A k-point is a k-point in Siesta AND in Tran
Thank you again for the reply
For question 2 isn’t it defined as Ky and Kz so I’m not sure I get your point
that it is fine
For question 3 if our electrodes like our system are skewed ( direction of
transport interested are a2 and a3) are we allowed to say a2 a3 ? If not what
does a3 only mean f
Den tir. 10. dec. 2019 kl. 22.04 skrev El-abed Haidar <
ehai2...@uni.sydney.edu.au>:
> Good evening
> I was just wondering if we have a unit cell with skew vectors ( c vector
> for example having y and z components) I have the following TRANSIESTA
> questions:
>
This is only possible in 4.1 and be
Good evening
I was just wondering if we have a unit cell with skew vectors ( c vector for
example having y and z components) I have the following TRANSIESTA questions:
1- Based on siesta mail usually I usually define the k points as 1 1 100
Should I change it for skewed systems? I tried to look f
