Re: [SIESTA-L] for Au basis parameter

2009-06-29 Thread 김명자
 Dear Andrei


  Thank you for your reply.


I attached two files. One is for 1 unit cell and the other is for 2 unit
cell to the z-direction.

Would you test these files?

Joonho


Au.fdf
Description: Binary data


Au112.fdf
Description: Binary data


[SIESTA-L] for Au basis parameter

2009-06-28 Thread 김명자
Dear users

I have run a basis parameter for Au in a recently published paper in siesta.
It worked very good.
In my calculation I used 4 atoms in unit cell.
But when I tried to use 8 atoms for 2 unit cell, it made error like this.
What is this problem and how to deal with this?

* Maximum dynamic memory allocated =   132 MB
 The leading minor of order  119  of B is not positive definite.
 The factorization of B could not be completed
  and no eigenvalues or eigenvectors were computed.
Terminating due to failed diagonalisation
Stopping Program
basis parameters are

%block PAO.basis
  Au  3  split  0.025
n=6   02  E  99.0  3.76
  6.52  4.18
n=6   11  E  54.3  3.96
  6.90
n=5   22  E  54.3  4.11
  6.18 2.35
%endblock PAO.basis
The lattice vector and coordinates are like this.

 %block LatticeVectors
4.16   0.   0.
0.   4.16   0.
0.   0.   8.32
%endblock LatticeVectors
%block AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies
0.   0.   0. 1
2.08   2.08   0. 1
0.   2.08   2.08 1
2.08   0.0   2.08 1
0.   0.   4.16 1
2.08   2.08   4.16 1
0.   2.08   6.24 1
2.08   0.0   6.24 1
%endblock AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies

if you use following values, it works.

%block LatticeVectors
4.16   0.   0.
0.   4.16   0.
0.   0.   4.16
%endblock LatticeVectors
%block AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies
0.   0.   0. 1
2.08   2.08   0. 1
0.   2.08   2.08 1
2.08   0.0   2.08 1
%endblock AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies

Would anyone try to solve this problem?

Thank you,

Joonho