Randy,
This has to be said - on behalf of me and I am sure many others who wish
they could.
Your negativity, pessimism and general sour demeanour were only ever
matched by your arrogance towards the community as a whole and those who do
their best to represent it.
...Skeeve
*Skeeve Stevens - Se
> Regarding prop 103, that of course was a totally legitimate proposal
> and a reasonable subject for discussion, however it was abandoned by
> its author and I think for good reason.
i withdrew it as the discussion had made very clear that complexity and
policy wonkpersonship were careers that th
Dear Andy,
I want to thank you very sincerely for your service as the APNIC policy SIG
chair, and for your contributions to the Internet community of this region. I
trust that you’ll continue this work, and I hope that we’ll find ourselves
working together in future.
Regarding prop 103, that
Dear colleagues
Version 4 of prop-111: Request-based expansion of IPv6 default
allocation size, did not reach consensus at the APNIC 38 Policy SIG and
was abandoned.
Proposal details
This proposal would have modified the eligibility for an organization to
expand an existing allo
I've decided to stand down as chair of the APNIC Policy SIG. I'm doing this
for a number of reasons which I'll go into in this mail. I was not able to
attend APNIC38 as I am currently in the UK but to be honest even if I'd
been in New Zealand I'm not sure that I would have made the trip to
Brisbane
