I don't think your conclusion is supported by the statement from hostmaster...
We don't know of anyone who hasn't reached out to us doesn't mean that nobody
has reached out to them... It means that they are unaware.
Asking the hostmasters about this issue in the way you did is akin to walking
Rather than being a laughing matter this proposal seeks to hand out ASNs
with no more justification than I want one.
Can the authors explain why they feel radical change to existing policy is
required?
On Friday, 6 February 2015, Skeeve Stevens ske...@v4now.com wrote:
hahahahahahahahahah
You're right that it's just one data point.
I'd encourage anyone with any further information to present it.
At the moment I'm not seeing the requirement here.
On Friday, 6 February 2015, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
I don't think your conclusion is supported by the statement from
hahahahahahahahahah
...to walking into a room full of people and saying Everyone who is not
here, please raise your hand and concluding from the lack of raised hands
that everyone is present.
This made my morning.
...Skeeve
*Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker*
*v4Now - *an eintellego Networks
I support this proposal as well.
Regards,
Usman
From: Job Snijders j...@instituut.net
To: Masato Yamanishi myama...@gmail.com
Cc: sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2015, 7:19
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal] prop-114: Modification in the
ASN
