Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal] prop-114: Modification in the ASN eligibility criteria

Dean, Pleas enlighten us on what version you would support. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service ske...@v4now.com ; www.v4now.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/v4now ;

Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal] prop-114: Modification in the ASN eligibility criteria

There is a version of this that I would support, this isn't it. On Sunday, 8 February 2015, Owen DeLong wrote: > I do agree with Dean that this proposal in its current state is too > radical, but I do support relaxing the requirements to multi home _or_ > unique routing policy would be an impr

Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal] prop-114: Modification in the ASN eligibility criteria

I do agree with Dean that this proposal in its current state is too radical, but I do support relaxing the requirements to multi home _or_ unique routing policy would be an improvement that addresses the issue raised in the problem statement. Owen > On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:07, Skeeve Stevens