FWIW, a few years ago we did have at least two APRICOTs where there was
nothing in parallel with the Thursday Policy SIG. It meant that the
technical/ops part of the conference finished on Wednesday. APRICOT 2009
was one example - for reference. (And tech/ops people left on Wednesday
night.)
But w
OK... so a year in the future... that should easily be dealt with by
talking to the Apricot Program Committee... as it is a very reasonable and
obvious thing to do.
Is it possible for this meeting? Competing event for Policy means there
will be little reason to entice people to come .
...Skee
Skeeve,
Unfortunately, I don't think we can change the schedule in this meeting.
I'm asking about future meetings.
Regards,
Masato
2015-03-01 18:46 GMT-08:00 Skeeve Stevens :
> Masato-san,
>
> Are you suggesting that we are able to change either Policy or Lightening
> talks for this event? I w
Masato-san,
Are you suggesting that we are able to change either Policy or Lightening
talks for this event? I would love to go to both.
I think this is only really a problem at Apricot events, not APNIC events.
...Skeeve
*Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker*
*v4Now - *an eintellego Networks ser
Dear All,
While this point was raised by Jessica, Skeeve, and Dean during the ML
discussion,
it is also big question for me, which day and time-slot is best for Policy
SIG.
Historically, we have SIG session somewhere in Thu.
However, do you think it is a barrier for wider participation?
(e.g. man
Personally,I don't see any benefit,which community may be getting after
accepting this proposal. I don't support this proposal.
Regards,
Ajai Kumar
On 24 February 2015 at 22:41, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I don’t believe the proposal offers enough benefit to be worth what
> implementation would likely
