I echo Aftab's position. As the endorsement is with a rider which is
different from the consensus arrived at OPM/AGM, then as per the APNIC 111
(APNIC Policy Development Process), Section 4, Step 5, EC can refer the
proposal back to Policy SIG for discussions.
Regards
Anupam Agrawal
On Wed, Dec
Dear SIG members,
A new proposal "prop-156-v001: Assignment of Temporary IP Resources"
has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting (OPM) at APNIC 57 on
Thursday, 29 February 2024.
https://2024.apricot.net/program/program/#/day/9/
We invite you
I seconded the Aftab's opinion.
Regards,
Gaurav
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 05:59, Aftab Siddiqui
wrote:
> I urge the EC to revisit the decision on the fee waiver. The policy's
> intent was to promote the uptake of PI IPv6 by balancing incentivization
> with the recovery of costs for services
I urge the EC to revisit the decision on the fee waiver. The policy's
intent was to promote the uptake of PI IPv6 by balancing incentivization
with the recovery of costs for services provided to resource holders. A
12-month fee waiver, unfortunately fails horribly to meet this purpose and
Dear colleagues
The APNIC Executive Council endorsed the proposal, prop-155: IPv6 PI Assignment
for Associate Members, at its meeting on 26-28 November 2023.
https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-155/
The EC has also decided to waive the fees on IPv6 PI assignments under
